Gohmert: Gays Shouldn’t Serve In Military Because Massages
Click here for reuse options!“I’ve had people say, ‘Hey, you know, there’s nothing wrong with gays in the military. Look at the Greeks,'” he said. “Well, you know, they did have people come along who they loved that was the same sex and would give them massages before they went into battle. But you know what, it’s a different kind of fighting, it’s a different kind of war and if you’re sitting around getting massages all day ready to go into a big, planned battle, then you’re not going to last very long. It’s guerrilla fighting. You are going to be ultimately vulnerable to terrorism and if that’s what you start doing in the military like the Greeks did … as people have said, ‘Louie, you have got to understand, you don’t even know your history.’ Oh yes I do. I know exactly. It’s not a good idea.”
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
searambler October 22nd, 2014 at 22:05
“I’ve had people say, ‘Hey, you know, there’s nothing wrong with gays in the military. Look at the Greeks,’”
I’ll bet anyone here ten thousand bucks that no one has ever said that to Louie. Any takers?
searambler October 22nd, 2014 at 22:05
Douchebagsezwhat?
searambler October 22nd, 2014 at 22:05
“I’ve had people say, ‘Hey, you know, there’s nothing wrong with gays in the military. Look at the Greeks,’”
I’ll bet anyone here ten thousand bucks that no one has ever said that to Louie. Any takers?
searambler October 22nd, 2014 at 22:05
Douchebagsezwhat?
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:00
When you really think about it, sitting around and obsessing about soldiers, massages and Greeks is some pretty gay sh*t
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:02
Totally gay. You know, like wearing boas and chaps, visiting bathhouses, and whatever other trite, sexualizing and objectifying stereotypes I can apply to gay people while I’m “defending” them against someone who acts a little worse toward them than I do.
/s
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:06
You missed the parody.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:07
No, unfortunately, I really didn’t. It would have been nice if I had though.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:07
“Parody,” much like “satire,” is rapidly losing its meaning. I blame South Park and Family Guy.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:16
I’m just not very PC.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:17
I’d really like someone who unironically uses the term “PC” to give me a working definition of it one of these days.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:18
Political Correctness: n. That unfortunate development in society where the dominant class is no longer overtly rewarded for exercising their unearned privilege and running roughshod over marginalized people, and instead, every once in awhile faces social consequences for it.
(mine – it’s not canonical)
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
It’s the same nonsense as “SJW.” An attempt to detach activism from the identities of the marginalized groups.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
“SJW” is the new “identity politics”
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
“Divisive.”
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:22
*beats someone over the head with the club of institutionalized oppression*
*gets told “hey, maybe if it’s not too much trouble you could stop hitting me over the head with that thing, cuz umm. it really hurts?”*
*”WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO DIVIDE PEOPLE?!! HENGH?!!!”*
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:23
I also adore when POLITICIANS brag about not being PC. I don’t think I’d last very long at any job where I bragged about how incorrectly I was doing it to my boss.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:24
Heheheheheh, yeah. The irony of a politician saying “I’m politically incorrect” is like a politician who gets elected on a platform of “I hate the government and I don’t believe the job you’re entrusting me with should even exist!”
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:26
Ironically, I’d really like such a candidate, if they actually existed. Instead we get posers like the Pauls who co-opt the term Libertarian for an-cap nonsense.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:28
Well, yeah in theory.
In practice the idiots like the Pauls and the assorted “anti-government” malcontents just want a free-ride on someone’s dime. Anti-government to them only means not having to do any sort of work.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:30
As I understand it, that’s pretty much how all an-caps roll. No taxes, yet somehow currency and private property laws persist. Invisible hand or something.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:35
NAP! The magic NAP
It’s all NAP
OH MY GOD IT’S FULL OF NAP!
LOL
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:37
Getting kinda late here, that sounds like a good idea.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:39
NAP stands for Non-Aggression Principle.
It’s the unicorn of both American Libertarianism and “anarcho”-capitalism.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:40
I’m familiar with it. I was just cracking a fairly lame pun.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
I thought you might be – but I wasn’t sure. =)
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
My favorite t-shirt that I own.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
I love that so much. LOL
Rani Bakr October 24th, 2014 at 04:41
WANT
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:31
I think it’s likely depends on the sensitivities of whomever is offended. I try to find humor in just about everything, and like being around people who do the same. I worked with a black guy. We were having a beer in one of those great old hardwood taverns in a Polish neighborhood. There was a show on the TV (pick a polka). My buddy observed the dancing for a few moments and exclaimed loudly “Those Polish people sho’ do have natural rhythm”. Every one in the bar laughed. I nearly laughed myself sick. It seemed back then we were better able to laugh at ourselves. If one tries to continuously cater to the absolute highest denominator of protocols, we would say nothing at all.
Yes I got the part where you weren’t agreeing.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:35
If you really can’t come up with jokes that aren’t at the expense of marginalized groups, you’re frankly just not a very funny person. Maybe avoid open mic night.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:36
Arguably all groups can say they are marginalized.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:38
Arguably a large number of them can shut up. Rich cishet white able-bodied neurotypical men, for example.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
^this
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
Well I’m non of the above save able bodied.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:50
So you’re trans?
Gay?
A woman, or non-binary?
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:56
Look. I’m not going to engage you in a conversation. I saw how you picked apart Tommy, and simply spews a lot of condescending nonsense at a person whom I believe doesn’t have a prejudicial bone in his body. If somehow you wish to see yourself as so much more enlightened and tolerant than the rest of the world, that’s fine. Go forth and be well.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 01:08
I didn’t actually pick apart Tommy. I was even pretty evenhanded with him, which he acknowledged.
So whatever. Don’t answer the questions. Your facebook profile makes it pretty clear that you didn’t really think about your response to rusty before you said it.
I’m not enlightened, and I probably never will be. If one thinks they’re enlightened they’ll never make progress toward it.
I’m not tolerant at all. Tolerance simply means making excuses for bad behavior. If I was tolerant I wouldn’t have responded to your crass post to begin with.
The truth is, I’m one of the most intolerant people you’ll probably ever meet outside your circle of ex-cops.
The thing is, I don’t need to tolerate people, no matter how different. It’s no issue for me. I can accept someone regardless of race, sexual orientation, gender, or any other intrinsic part of their being. In fact, I think if you have to “tolerate” them over that there is something deeply wrong with you.
But behavior? Yeah – there’s a lot of things I won’t tolerate. I’m anti-fascist. I don’t tolerate systematic oppression, or casual bigotry. I don’t tolerate blaming others for one’s own poor choices. I don’t tolerate greed, or indifference to injustice. I don’t tolerate murder. I don’t tolerate rape, or rapists.
There’s a lot of things I don’t tolerate.
I’m not about to apologize for it, either.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:30
too too many I’s in your ramble
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 04:03
How so? He was talking about me, so my response was about me.
Would it have been better if I had simply leveled similar accusations at him?
And I wasn’t actually rambling. I felt ,my response was cogent. I took care to make sure I addressed his significant arguments.
The reason I spent time on tolerance is that he used it like a cheap, throwaway word, so he seemed to need a lesson in it.
Sorry you didn’t like what I had to say – I don’t really write to please people – I simply say what I mean.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:55
Just by your facebook profile you certainly look white, so you probably get treated white.
Do you have some sort of debilitating mental illness, an autism spectrum disorder? If not we can add neurotypical.
So it looks like you’re most likely at the very least an able-bodied cishet white man – with a better than even chance you’re neurotypical.
Seems the only thing you’re really missing is rich – and that’s pretty relative.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
You might argue it, but that’s a debate you’d lose.
jasperjava October 23rd, 2014 at 03:08
Rusty, about William:
“you’re frankly just not a very funny person.”
On this, I come to the defense of William. This particular joke, at the expense of gay people, was in poor taste. But William has razor-sharp wit and insight when it comes to exposing right-wing stupidity. His body of work is impressive. You would profit by taking it in and appreciating it.
One thing we need to avoid as liberals is to lob grenades at each other for our imperfections. We are all the products of a global mind-distorting capitalist propaganda infotainment system. Some of us are more aware of our conditioning than others. We are all somewhere on a continuum between the most depraved right-wing bigot and the most enlightened liberal paragon. Most of us here, including our friend William, are MUCH closer to the “liberal” end of the spectrum than, say, the Pat Robertson side.
We have to band together if we want to defeat the evil right-wing fascists. We have to accept that sometimes one of us will occasionally stumble due to the programming that has been ingrained in us by the System. We can chide when necessary, but let us be gentle to one another. There is a more important war to be fought.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 10:38
I’m an anarcho-commmunist. I’m not a liberal, and I’m not on your “team.” I detest petty tribalism, and I’m no fan of Democrats. I’m left-wing, to be sure, but the left-wing does not have any actual representation in this country. We have right-wing and center-right.
So I’m the wrong target to try that party uber alles stuff on.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 10:49
Anarcho-communism uber alles!
*awkward high five*
=)
I wish I could upvote your comment as many times as it deserves.
F–k bourgeois liberalism
jasperjava October 23rd, 2014 at 13:31
All political movements have had to depend on alliances. I’m sorry that you don’t consider me a comrade or fellow-traveller or what have you. I will make a common front with anyone willing to fight right-wing Fascism, militarism, economic feudalism, ignorance, hatred, bigotry, etc.
I think we’re on the same side. Sorry if you disagree.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 13:34
I detest right-wing fascism, militarism, economic feudalism, ignorance, hatred, and bigotry too.
Where we disagree is that I classify Democrats under all of that too.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:27
can you tell a joke that is not at the expense of someone/thing else???
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 10:52
You can tell a joke that’s not at the expense of marginalized people.
A janitor making a joke toward a CEO is fair game
A CEO making a joke about a janitor is pretty crass.
Jokes have always been a way to speak truth to power.
It’s sycophantic and cretinous to use jokes to reinforce oppression.
David M October 27th, 2014 at 14:16
It really depends on the joke. And how it is meant..
Prefacing this with I am a 49 year old (sigh, ok, 50) gay man who came out of the closet when I was 19…… (I LOVE this joke – there is nothing wrong with it)
A college girl gets drunk off tequila in a bar. For fun, she takes off her panties and walks down the street, giggling. She walks up to a boyscout. Raising her skirt up and down, she says “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!” The boyscout is appalled! She giggles and continues down the road. She walks up to an old man. Raising her skirt up and down she says, “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!”. The old man is horrified.. She giggles and continues down the road. She walks up to a gay man.. “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!”. The gay man looks at her vagina and says, “I think I’ll have the soup”.
Rani Bakr October 24th, 2014 at 04:39
Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
A: Chickens aren’t a marginalized social minority and also aren’t people and you ask absurd questions.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:25
If it means Politically Correct – then it requires the user to wear a dark suite and lie.
David M October 27th, 2014 at 14:10
It’s the thing you are typing on right now.. Duh! (kidding!)
congero November 18th, 2014 at 12:37
hi rusty it is me again. dr. gonzo is asking for proof of threats by bundy supporters on the ferguson protest thread @ mm. here are some:http://aattp.org/cops-bundys-terrorist-militia-pointed-weapons-at-officers-wanted-violent-outcome-video/
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 00:17
“I love how people have turned the idea of not being a racist, ableist, sexist, trans*phobic, queerphobic f*cknut into the phrase “political correctness”.
Because it’s much easier to say “I don’t like all this PC stuff” than it is to say “I actually like my position at the top of the hierarchy and though I know that I’m only here because many people suffer every day, I don’t plan on changing it, because this is waaaay too comfortable.”
torri sepi December 3rd, 2014 at 05:48
I think the anti-androgen is affecting your brain.
OldLefty December 3rd, 2014 at 06:36
Can you refute it?
torri sepi December 24th, 2014 at 05:43
No, of course not. It is a totally wild guess, based on her name, her photo and of course the most telling, her comments.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:00
When you really think about it, sitting around and obsessing about soldiers, massages and Greeks is some pretty gay sh*t
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:02
Totally gay. You know, like wearing boas and chaps, visiting bathhouses, and whatever other trite, sexualizing and objectifying stereotypes I can apply to gay people while I’m “defending” them against someone who acts a little worse toward them than I do.
/s
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:06
You missed the parody.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:07
No, unfortunately, I really didn’t. It would have been nice if I had though.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:07
“Parody,” much like “satire,” is rapidly losing its meaning. I blame South Park and Family Guy.
EDIT: Apparently you missed the point I was trying to make. I’m not agreeing with you, Bill. Parody and satire are supposed to be subversive. This joke is just played out and trite.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:16
I’m just not very PC.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:17
I’d really like someone who unironically uses the term “PC” to give me a working definition of it one of these days.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:18
Political Correctness: n. That unfortunate development in society where the dominant class is no longer overtly rewarded for exercising their unearned privilege and running roughshod over marginalized people, and instead, every once in awhile faces social consequences for it.
(mine – it’s not canonical)
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
It’s the same nonsense as “SJW.” An attempt to detach activism from the identities of the marginalized groups.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
“SJW” is the new “identity politics”
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:20
“Divisive.”
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:22
*beats someone over the head with the club of institutionalized oppression*
*gets told “hey, maybe if it’s not too much trouble you could stop hitting me over the head with that thing, cuz umm. it really hurts?”*
*”WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO DIVIDE PEOPLE?!! HENGH?!!!”*
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:23
I also adore when POLITICIANS brag about not being PC. I don’t think I’d last very long at any job where I bragged about how incorrectly I was doing it to my boss.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:24
Heheheheheh, yeah. The irony of a politician saying “I’m politically incorrect” is like a politician who gets elected on a platform of “I hate the government and I don’t believe the job you’re entrusting me with should even exist!”
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:26
Ironically, I’d really like such a candidate, if they actually existed. Instead we get posers like the Pauls who co-opt the term Libertarian for an-cap nonsense.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:28
Well, yeah in theory.
In practice the idiots like the Pauls and the assorted “anti-government” malcontents just want a free-ride on someone’s dime. Anti-government to them only means not having to do any sort of work.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:30
As I understand it, that’s pretty much how all an-caps roll. No taxes, yet somehow currency and private property laws persist. Invisible hand or something.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:35
NAP! The magic NAP
It’s all NAP
OH MY GOD IT’S FULL OF NAP!
LOL
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:37
Getting kinda late here, that sounds like a good idea.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:39
NAP stands for Non-Aggression Principle.
It’s the unicorn of both American Libertarianism and “anarcho”-capitalism.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:40
I’m familiar with it. I was just cracking a fairly lame pun.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
I thought you might be – but I wasn’t sure. =)
Besides, it gave me an opportunity to refer to unicorns.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
My favorite t-shirt that I own.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
I love that so much. LOL
Rani Baker October 24th, 2014 at 04:41
WANT
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:31
I think it’s likely depends on the sensitivities of whomever is offended. I try to find humor in just about everything, and like being around people who do the same. I worked with a black guy. We were having a beer in one of those great old hardwood taverns in a Polish neighborhood. There was a show on the TV (pick a polka). My buddy observed the dancing for a few moments and exclaimed loudly “Those Polish people sho’ do have natural rhythm”. Every one in the bar laughed. I nearly laughed myself sick. It seemed back then we were better able to laugh at ourselves. If one tries to continuously cater to the absolute highest denominator of protocols, we would say nothing at all.
Yes I got the part where you weren’t agreeing.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:35
If you really can’t come up with jokes that aren’t at the expense of marginalized groups, you’re frankly just not a very funny person. Maybe avoid open mic night.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:36
Arguably all groups can say they are marginalized.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 00:38
Arguably a large number of them can shut up. Rich cishet white able-bodied neurotypical men, for example.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
^this
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:43
Well I’m none of the above save able bodied.
William October 23rd, 2014 at 00:56
Look. I’m not going to engage you in a conversation. I saw how you picked apart Tommy, and simply spews a lot of condescending nonsense at a person whom I believe doesn’t have a prejudicial bone in his body. If somehow you wish to see yourself as so much more enlightened and tolerant than the rest of the world, that’s fine. Go forth and be well.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:30
too too many I’s in your ramble
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 04:03
How so? He was talking about me, so my response was about me.
Would it have been better if I had simply leveled similar accusations at him?
And I wasn’t actually rambling. I felt ,my response was cogent. I took care to make sure I addressed his significant arguments.
The reason I spent time on tolerance is that he used it like a cheap, throwaway word, so he seemed to need a lesson in it.
Sorry you didn’t like what I had to say – I don’t really write to please people – I simply say what I mean.
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:41
You might argue it, but that’s a debate you’d lose.
jasperjava October 23rd, 2014 at 03:08
Rusty, about William:
“you’re frankly just not a very funny person.”
On this, I come to the defense of William. This particular joke, at the expense of gay people, was in poor taste. But William has razor-sharp wit and insight when it comes to exposing right-wing stupidity. His body of work is impressive. You would profit by taking it in and appreciating it.
One thing we need to avoid as liberals is to lob grenades at each other for our imperfections. We are all the products of a global mind-distorting capitalist propaganda infotainment system. Some of us are more aware of our conditioning than others. We are all somewhere on a continuum between the most depraved right-wing bigot and the most enlightened liberal paragon. Most of us here, including our friend William, are MUCH closer to the “liberal” end of the spectrum than, say, the Pat Robertson side.
We have to band together if we want to defeat the evil right-wing fascists. We have to accept that sometimes one of us will occasionally stumble due to the programming that has been ingrained in us by the System. We can chide when necessary, but let us be gentle to one another. There is a more important war to be fought.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 10:38
I’m an anarcho-commmunist. I’m not a liberal, and I’m not on your “team.” I detest petty tribalism, and I’m no fan of Democrats. I’m left-wing, to be sure, but the left-wing does not have any actual representation in this country. We have right-wing and center-right.
So I’m the wrong target to try that party uber alles stuff on.
jasperjava October 23rd, 2014 at 13:31
All political movements have had to depend on alliances. I’m sorry that you don’t consider me a comrade or fellow-traveller or what have you. I will make a common front with anyone willing to fight right-wing Fascism, militarism, economic feudalism, ignorance, hatred, bigotry, etc.
I think we’re on the same side. Sorry if you disagree.
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 13:34
I detest right-wing fascism, militarism, economic feudalism, ignorance, hatred, and bigotry too.
Where we disagree is that I classify Democrats under all of that too.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:27
can you tell a joke that is not at the expense of someone/thing else???
Rusty Shackleford October 23rd, 2014 at 10:33
Easily. Besides that, I can also tell jokes that poke fun at privileged groups and existing power structures, rather than marginalized people. There’s also always self-deprecating humor.
Two muffins are sitting in an oven. One turns to the other and says, “Man, is it hot in here or WHAT?” The other looks back and replies “HOLY SHIT A TALKING MUFFIN!”
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 10:52
You can tell a joke that’s not at the expense of marginalized people.
A janitor making a joke toward a CEO is fair game
A CEO making a joke about a janitor is pretty crass.
Jokes have always been a way to speak truth to power.
It’s sycophantic and cretinous to use jokes to reinforce oppression.
David M October 27th, 2014 at 14:16
It really depends on the joke. And how it is meant..
Prefacing this with I am a 49 year old (sigh, ok, 50) gay man who came out of the closet when I was 19…… (I LOVE this joke – there is nothing wrong with it)
A college girl gets drunk off tequila in a bar. For fun, she takes off her panties and walks down the street, giggling. She walks up to a boyscout. Raising her skirt up and down, she says “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!” The boyscout is appalled! She giggles and continues down the road. She walks up to an old man. Raising her skirt up and down she says, “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!”. The old man is horrified.. She giggles and continues down the road. She walks up to a gay man.. “Super pussy! Super pussy! Super pussy!”. The gay man looks at her vagina and says, “I think I’ll have the soup”.
Rani Baker October 24th, 2014 at 04:39
Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
A: Chickens aren’t a marginalized social minority and also aren’t people and you ask absurd questions.
fahvel October 23rd, 2014 at 03:25
If it means Politically Correct – then it requires the user to wear a dark suite and lie.
David M October 27th, 2014 at 14:10
It’s the thing you are typing on right now.. Duh! (kidding!)
𝒹𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒽 ℊ𝒶𝓏 ❤💀👿 October 23rd, 2014 at 00:17
“I love how people have turned the idea of not being a racist, ableist, sexist, trans*phobic, queerphobic f*cknut into the phrase “political correctness”.
Because it’s much easier to say “I don’t like all this PC stuff” than it is to say “I actually like my position at the top of the hierarchy and though I know that I’m only here because many people suffer every day, I don’t plan on changing it, because this is waaaay too comfortable.”
torri December 3rd, 2014 at 06:48
I think the anti-androgen is affecting your brain.
OldLefty December 3rd, 2014 at 07:36
Can you refute it?
torri December 24th, 2014 at 06:43
No, of course not. It is a totally wild guess, based on her name, her photo and of course the most telling, her comments.
Boehner-Monkey October 23rd, 2014 at 02:49
~~Where can you find pleasure
Search the world for treasure
Learn science technology~~
Boehner Monkey October 23rd, 2014 at 02:49
~~Where can you find pleasure
Search the world for treasure
Learn science technology~~
rg9rts October 23rd, 2014 at 04:12
How can Texans be sooooooooo stupid????
Roctuna October 23rd, 2014 at 07:43
It’s pretty easy for most of ’em.
MarcoZandrini October 23rd, 2014 at 09:33
They’re……….Texans.
rg9rts October 23rd, 2014 at 04:12
How can Texans be sooooooooo stupid????
Roctuna October 23rd, 2014 at 07:43
It’s pretty easy for most of ’em.
MarcoZandrini October 23rd, 2014 at 09:33
They’re……….Texans.
Anomaly 100 October 23rd, 2014 at 08:46
I’m sorry. My bad. I didn’t’ realize that you’re the only gay person in the world, therefore, your comment must be right.
As I sit here with my BFF, she’s shaking her head at this comment thread. She’s a lesbian. We live together and have for over 20 years. It’s not as if I don’t know about the stereotypical paintbrush others use on the gay community daily. As a matter of fact, I’ve felt it. Many people assume I’m gay because of my close relationship with my BFF. And to them, I give zero fucks.
Tommy is a friend and an advocate for LGBT causes. You are being your own worst enemy here. I thank God for people like him, willing to fight the good fight for my BFF, her gay brothers, and all of my gay friends and gf, I have a ton of them.
androgyne anode October 23rd, 2014 at 11:00
Yay, tokenism, the first refuge of bourgeoisie liberals everywhere.
An American in Canada October 23rd, 2014 at 09:53
Why is this still an issue. GOP running out of things to talk about, so let’s loop around?
An American in Canada October 23rd, 2014 at 09:53
Why is this still an issue. GOP running out of things to talk about, so let’s loop around?
mmaynard119 October 23rd, 2014 at 16:28
Gohmert represents the first district in Texas. He won election in 2012 with 71.74%. He represents the attitudes and knowledge level of the people he represents.
mmaynard119 October 23rd, 2014 at 16:28
Gohmert represents the first district in Texas. He won election in 2012 with 71.74%. He represents the attitudes and knowledge level of the people he represents.
Rani Bakr October 24th, 2014 at 04:35
Uh… when the Greeks went into battle it was all spears and swords and heads and limbs getting cut off.. what the hell kinda mamby-pamby bullshit wars does this dude think were getting fought in the BC?
Rani Baker October 24th, 2014 at 04:35
Uh… when the Greeks went into battle it was all spears and swords and heads and limbs getting cut off.. what the hell kinda mamby-pamby bullshit wars does this dude think were getting fought in the BC?
Zach Cox October 25th, 2014 at 11:31
We get it, Gohmert, you’re gay. It’s okay, you can come out of the closet.
Zach Akai October 25th, 2014 at 11:31
We get it, Gohmert, you’re gay. It’s okay, you can come out of the closet.