No, attendance was not ‘astronomical’

Posted by | January 20, 2017 18:33 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics

Donald Trump marvels at telling the world how lavish and awesome he is and how any event he throws is billions times more better than anything in the history of the world. He was was interviewed by Ainsley Earhardt of Fox and Friends a few days ago and said, “We’re going to have a tremendous turnout.…


By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

32 responses to No, attendance was not ‘astronomical’

  1. mea_mark January 20th, 2017 at 18:39

    Saw this on twitter …

    Park Service estimates lowest attendance of inauguration since second term of Nixon. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ #PresidentTrump— Atomic Elbow (@AtomicElbow1) January 20, 2017

  2. amersham1046 January 20th, 2017 at 18:46

    seems to be a flaw in the estimated numbers

    • Larry Schmitt January 20th, 2017 at 19:04

      The numbers are rigged.

      • whatthe46 January 20th, 2017 at 19:57

        his supporters are crying the protesters wouldn’t let them in. no, the ones that could afford to attend did, the other 92% live in trailers and just couldn’t make it. duh.

  3. CHOCOL8MILK January 20th, 2017 at 18:48

    There you go again, using facts and such. Urgh.

  4. arc99 January 20th, 2017 at 19:01

    I will play the role of a Trump supporter and post their stock reply to every criticism.




    WE WON!

    LOCK HER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Larry Schmitt January 20th, 2017 at 19:03


    • Obewon January 21st, 2017 at 00:23

      Some guy at my office today: “why is she still walk’n around?”-Govt. IT worker.

  5. amersham1046 January 20th, 2017 at 19:30

    It was a logistical problem–
    Many of the people planners expected to be there wanted to be somewhere else

  6. robert January 20th, 2017 at 19:49

    Thousands and thousands

    With tickets left over

  7. Budda January 20th, 2017 at 22:05

    not to pee on the parade but look at the picture. Leaves on the trees?

    • crc3 January 21st, 2017 at 10:51

      Climate change is real Non-prez Rump is a dork….

  8. labman57 January 20th, 2017 at 22:24

    And of course, Trump will claim that those who attended his inauguration are “true patriots” (implying people attending Obama’s were not), and right wing pundits will suggest that Obama’s crowd was largely comprised of “undesirables” such as undocumented immigrants, gays, and Muslims.

    Oh, and then there are the tin foil-laden conspiracy theory-addicted whack jobs who will insist that the photos of Trump’s sparse crowd have been digitally altered to make him look bad. Cuz his crowds were hyuuuge, the biggest ever!

    • fahvel January 21st, 2017 at 03:12

      so what – get to work!!!!!!!!!!!

      • labman57 January 21st, 2017 at 09:32

        Your response exemplifies everything that is wrong about Donnie’s support base.

  9. fahvel January 21st, 2017 at 03:11

    it’s all well and good to make fun of something irrelevant but the sht is now your pres – so forget the gloating about show size and get you collective asses into geat non stop, non stop, to tear down every breath the mofo takes.

    • Willys41 January 21st, 2017 at 16:20

      The only way the Trump train wreck is going to be stopped is in the courts and that takes money and a lot of very smart lawyers.

  10. William January 21st, 2017 at 11:52

  11. Willys41 January 21st, 2017 at 16:11

    Two birds with one stone: Trump got humiliated and scalpers got screwed. Make it three birds because our everyday heros on the police force maybe got some OT.

    Now everybody download copies of all the pics and videos of empty spaces where crowds did NOT attend so when the Reichfuhrer’s internet gestapo begin cleansing YouTube we can post everything all over again.

  12. bpollen January 22nd, 2017 at 01:30

    Frankly, I think the attendance WAS astronomical. Outer space is mostly empty space, so the universe and the inauguration have THAT in common.

Leave a Reply