Stylist who wouldn’t work for Marla Maples for free told ‘You are messing with the president’

Posted by | January 17, 2017 19:02 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics

Republish
Reprint

Marla Maples wanted a stylist to prepare her for the inauguration in return for free social media.

A hair stylist said that she received a vaguely threatening email from a PR contact after she refused to style Donald Trump’s ex-wife and their daughter in exchange for “exposure,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Freelance stylist Tricia Kelly told the Post that she was contacted by a longtime client with ties to the Trumps about the possibility of styling Marla Maples and Tiffany Trump for the inauguration. After a short back and forth about rates, Maples’ assistant reportedly asked Kelly if she would do their hair for free in exchange for “exposure” on Maples’ social media accounts.

Kelly told the Post that she declined not only over the lack of payment but also due to a personal policy of not associating herself publicly with people in politics…

“You are messing with the president of the United States,” the contact wrote her, according to the Post. “She is used to a certain lifestyle and you don’t understand that.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

17 responses to Stylist who wouldn’t work for Marla Maples for free told ‘You are messing with the president’

  1. amersham1046 January 17th, 2017 at 19:04

    we are millionaires, so we get it for free, OR ELSE

    • Willys41 January 18th, 2017 at 05:41

      That’s how Trump makes his living, though he usually uses lawyers to threaten people.

  2. mea_mark January 17th, 2017 at 19:06

    I wouldn’t want the exposure they would give. It would be like asking to be harassed and hated. I want to be on the right side of history, not the wrong.

    • whatthe46 January 17th, 2017 at 19:34

      something is seriously wrong with those people. entitled bastards.

  3. Suzanne McFly January 17th, 2017 at 19:51

    The rumps seem like a gaudier version of the palin family.

  4. Obewon January 17th, 2017 at 20:15

    “She is used to a (grifter) lifestyle and you don’t understand that.” Married 1993, Divorced 1997. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-history-women-adultery-objectification-article-1.2604073

  5. Larry Schmitt January 17th, 2017 at 20:25

    Even his exes still think they’re entitled. Kick her ass out the door.

  6. nola878 January 17th, 2017 at 21:56

    Didn’t they used to send people up the river for extortion?

    • fahvel January 18th, 2017 at 01:57

      does “up the river” mean going to jail like the song, sing sing?

      • Willys41 January 18th, 2017 at 05:40

        Going “up the river” is the same as “going to the big house.”

        Sing Sing = maximum security state prison Ossining, NY. Located about 30 miles up the Hudson River from NYC.

        Sing sing sing = song by Prima, Goodman, others

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2S1I_ien6A

        • nola878 January 18th, 2017 at 11:13

          Exactly. Always loved the expression…very fitting.

  7. Mike January 18th, 2017 at 00:03

    She is used to a certain lifestyle …
    Yea right….she was bimbo #2 while he was married to bimbo #1 .. it lasted about 20 months, as soon as she dropped the kid she filed for divorce.

    She not just the definition of ‘gold digger’, her life is a play by play manual….How to Land a Billionaire for Dummies

    • robert January 18th, 2017 at 00:58

      Wealthy on paper as we used to say in the old neighborhood.

  8. robert January 18th, 2017 at 00:55

    Maybe I was wrong to defend Tiffany

    I apologize in advance

  9. Willys41 January 18th, 2017 at 05:26

    Same morals as the mafia.

  10. Beau Phillips January 18th, 2017 at 07:23

    Do her hair right or I’ll repeal and replace your hair dryer!

  11. William January 18th, 2017 at 10:41

    Time for a nice invigorating Nair shampoo

Leave a Reply