Obama unloads: ‘We don’t have time for charlatans…bigotry…flim-flam’

Posted by | June 25, 2016 13:30 | Filed under: Politics

Republish
Reprint


The president went on a tear and a fundraiser about how the Trump Republican Party is “looking for scapegoats [and] ignoring the evidence.”

Obama said it’s important for all Americans to “assume the best in each other and not the worst,” and then said this:

“We don’t have time for charlatans and we don’t have time for hatred and we don’t have time for bigotry and we don’t have time for film-flam and we don’t have the luxury of just popping off and saying just whatever comes to the top of our heads. Don’t have time for that.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

44 responses to Obama unloads: ‘We don’t have time for charlatans…bigotry…flim-flam’

  1. Candide Gunn June 25th, 2016 at 14:34

    Then we don’t have time for Clinton

    • fredoandme June 25th, 2016 at 15:48

      oh, brother….

    • Red Mann June 25th, 2016 at 15:54

      And what is your alternative, let tRump win?

      • Candide Gunn June 25th, 2016 at 16:19

        force the DNC to dump Clinton at the alter

        • OldLefty June 25th, 2016 at 16:24

          Why??

          • Candide Gunn June 25th, 2016 at 19:43

            because she has been in dozens of scandals, scandal follows her like flies on a garbage scowl. Think about it, Obama hasn’t had scandals…no questionable business deals, no affairs, no suspicious deaths, no shady charity for arms deals, no secret e-mails or anything.

            When a person has that much shady stuff swirling around, it gets in the way of getting anything done and just going by her history she is going to be a disaster with her never ending scandals.

            • fahvel June 26th, 2016 at 02:53

              agai, NAME ONE!!!!!!!!

              • whatthe46 June 26th, 2016 at 03:16

                she won’t. she can’t.

            • OldLefty June 26th, 2016 at 06:06

              And most of Hillary’s “scandals” are fake manufactured by a cottage industry.
              I refuse to be so manipulated by the right.

              • Candide Gunn June 26th, 2016 at 07:21

                scandals can’t be manufactured out of thin air…there has to be something there to start with

                • OldLefty June 26th, 2016 at 11:05

                  Absolutely.
                  They take something very common, over report it, as if it is unique to your target, exaggerate it leave out exculpatory facts, And just generally manufacture a misleading spin.

                  • Candide Gunn June 26th, 2016 at 11:35

                    those scandals involved a lot of other people…they would have been scandals even without the Clintons but somehow the Clintons are always right there with their fingers in every scandal to come along…

                    Talk about a distraction from any country business taking place, it is going to be the exact same thing this time and she is going to have to bow to the republicans just like Bill did.

                    • OldLefty June 26th, 2016 at 20:02

                      They say that about everybody.
                      And they particularly hated the Clintons because they usurped their blue blood.

        • Red Mann June 25th, 2016 at 16:24

          Then what? I don’t understand why so many on the seem to hate Clinton on such a visceral level, seems to me it might be bleed over from long-term RW campaign against her.

          • Candide Gunn June 25th, 2016 at 19:28

            No, it is living long enough to have been around for ALL of her flip flops, bad judgement, lies and scandals…never ending scandals…she brought all of that on herself by always trying to grift and manipulate to get more and more money…she is never satisfied…whether it is Whitewater or Wall Street speeches…everything she has touched has had a scandal attached to it…dozens of scandals…how is that even possible?

            How many scandals have you been implicated in in your life time? I have managed to live a very long time without any, so how does someone have that many shady dealings attached to them?

            There are thousands and thousands of politicians who have never had even a hint of scandal so it isn’t just politics.

            • mea_mark June 25th, 2016 at 19:53

              Just because … http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3653237/Latest-hacked-Hillary-document-reveals-Democratic-Party-researched-Clinton-Foundation-s-vulnerabilities-42-PAGES-foundation-hacking-target-too.html I’m sure you will get something out of it.

            • Obewon June 25th, 2016 at 20:34

              No evidence and no indictment left both you and your GOP universally debunked on everything as sore losing crybabies.

            • Red Mann June 25th, 2016 at 22:40

              How many politicians in modern times have been the subject of vicious attacks based almost entirely of lies and distortions, how many subjected to modern levels of scrutiny where every word is captured and available at the click of a button. These “scandals” are more like ginned up nonsense. Sure Hillary plays hard ball, just like very high level politician since Julius Caesar, but this: “There are thousands and thousands of politicians who have never had even a hint of scandal so it isn’t just politics.” is utter nonsense.
              I’m thinking much of the irrational hatred of Mrs. Clinton is that she is tough and knows how to play the boy’s game as well, if not better, than they do.
              In any event, allowing this rather irrational hatred to not vote for her could easily, in today’s super-heated rhetoric, fulled by the uber-liars on the right, allow the most incompetent, egotistical nut job since Caligula to become the President of the United States, a story line right out of some dystopian movie. People like you scare me almost as much as the insane Trumpentroppers.

              • Candide Gunn June 26th, 2016 at 04:12

                You seriously claiming that Clinton is an Emperor? You braindead Clinton bots are scary. You will believe any lie she tells and are totally incapable of thinking for yourselves.

                Those of us who have been around awhile know better, she is a scandal magnet and will spend every minute putting out fires that she and Bill started and none working for the workers of America…

                She has nothing to run on except fear and that is not what makes a leader.

                • OldLefty June 26th, 2016 at 06:11

                  And those of us who have been around longer and fact checked know that there was a huge industry devoted to nothing but trashing the Clintons for replacing Bush in the Whitehouse and Hillary for not staying home and “baking cookies”.

                  • Candide Gunn June 26th, 2016 at 07:20

                    her scandals started long before she got to the White House

                    • OldLefty June 26th, 2016 at 11:08

                      Yes, by the Arkanas underbelly are the likes of Lee Atwater.

                • Red Mann June 26th, 2016 at 14:04

                  WTF are you babbling about? Of course sh’e a f*cking sandal magnet, just like Obama. The right has no real policies that work, they have to use lies, distortion and fear-mongering, and it works. Appealing to the lowest human emotions, they get the votes of non-critical thinkers. Clinton certainly has issues, but they are nowhere near what you HRC haters want them to be.

                  • Candide Gunn June 26th, 2016 at 19:53

                    Obama has not had any scandals …he seems to be a genuinely nice guy.

            • fahvel June 26th, 2016 at 02:52

              how many scandals, exactly what were they and how was Ms. Clinton involved and to what degree. You are the echo chamber and that is an empty space.

    • bpollen June 25th, 2016 at 16:16

      Trump thanks you for your vote. The world economy and diplomatic relationships don’t.

      • Candide Gunn June 25th, 2016 at 16:18

        You can vote for Trump if you want…not that he could be much worse than Clinton who is biting at the bit to start a war to prove how big her balls are.

        • bpollen June 25th, 2016 at 16:20

          Uh-huh. Sure.

        • OldLefty June 25th, 2016 at 16:25

          He would be infinitely worse.

          • mea_mark June 25th, 2016 at 17:40

            He’s too stupid to be much worse. He would be ineffectual and blocked at nearly every move. Clinton on the other hand … well let’s just say it looks like we will find out just how bad she can be. We will probably have four years of Clinton, then someone else.

            • OldLefty June 25th, 2016 at 20:03

              Frankly, I think she will be a good president.
              Trump could still appoint 3-4 SCOTUS.

        • Red Mann June 25th, 2016 at 16:25

          You seem to be a little nuts.

        • fahvel June 26th, 2016 at 02:51

          stop embarrassing yourself with that prattle.

  2. fredoandme June 25th, 2016 at 15:48

    no, mr. president, we don’t.

  3. StoneyCurtisll June 25th, 2016 at 20:45

    4 more years!!!

  4. amersham1046 June 25th, 2016 at 21:00

    ‘no time for charlatans…bigotry…flim-flam’. but those are the three pillars of the Tea Baggers

Leave a Reply