Christie vetoes equal pay for women

Posted by | May 3, 2016 10:26 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics


New Jersey Governor Chris Christie called it “business unfriendly.”

The bill that passed both chambers of the state’s legislature would have banned employers from paying women less for “substantially similar” work as men, and would only have allowed differing pay rates between genders if employers could prove it was based on something besides sex, such as education, experience, or performance. The similarity of the work would have been determined based on the required responsibilities, effort, and skills for jobs across all of an employer’s operations.

Most equal pay laws require the same pay for the exact same work. But New Jersey’s bill would have been much stronger, reaching beyond the exact same jobs to require women to be paid equally if they’re doing the same tasks in a different role. The problem is common given that when women enter a particular job, the pay drops because their work is valued less, even if it’s the same work being performed by men. For example, maids make less than janitors; high school teachers make less than college professors; women’s sports coaches tend to be paid less than men’s coaches.

This concept, known as pay equity or comparable worth, used to be popular among statehouses. By 1989, 20 states had analyzed the pay of their own workforces to see whether men and women performing essentially the same duties were being paid differently. Over a decade, they spent more than $527 million to give more than 335,000 women a raise because they were being paid less despite doing basically the same work as men, eliminating between 25 and 33 percent of the pay gap. A national law would have been one of the strongest ways to reduce the gender wage gap, getting rid of over a quarter of it. Minnesota still conducts regular pay equity assessments and has significantly narrowed its gap, and California already passed a law just like New Jersey’s.

But Christie specifically objected to this piece of the bill in his veto, calling it “nonsensical” and saying that it “makes New Jersey very business unfriendly.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

9 responses to Christie vetoes equal pay for women

  1. William May 3rd, 2016 at 10:29

    Lets not forget, this is the first governor to openly endorse Trump. One thing about the GOP. They are consistent when it comes to screwing things up.

    • Greta42 May 3rd, 2016 at 10:38

      They are oblivious it seems to a lot of things.

  2. Greta42 May 3rd, 2016 at 10:40

    I wonder what this has to do with Christie’s seeking the VP slot on the Trump ticket? Women could not hate both of them more.

  3. mistlesuede May 3rd, 2016 at 10:58

    His thirty percent approval in the state doesn’t have much further to go to reach zero.
    He might just accomplish that.

  4. Budda May 3rd, 2016 at 12:17

    Republicans just love the womens

    • Larry Schmitt May 3rd, 2016 at 13:51

      Binders full of ’em.

  5. Bunya May 3rd, 2016 at 13:17

    I think he knows his chances of getting re-elected are between slim and none, and he’s trying to screw the people of New Jersey before he leaves office. What an a-hole. The people should run him out of town.

  6. CandideThirtythree May 3rd, 2016 at 15:27

    So it is business friendly to cheat your workers? Those businesses need to be shut down then.

    He knows his political life is over so he is just doing stuff for spite now…just like he did when he had that bridge closed down, he is a nasty nasty man.

  7. John Smith May 3rd, 2016 at 21:17

    Keep voting for Bernie people so that he can stay in and continue to bash Hillary along with trump now. Trump is counting on you.

Leave a Reply