New position: Women would be punished ‘hypothetically’
Republican front-runner Donald Trump on Sunday defended his recent controversial abortion remarks by arguing that women would only “hypothetically” be punished if the practice was outlawed. During an interview on Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace pointed out that Trump’s campaign had been plagued by problems in recent days, from his top aide being charged with assault…
19 responses to New position: Women would be punished ‘hypothetically’
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
whatthe46 April 3rd, 2016 at 14:27
no one should be punished. this is such BULLSH!T!
Larry Schmitt April 3rd, 2016 at 15:07
Hypothetical bullshit.
whatthe46 April 3rd, 2016 at 14:37
there’s no WAR on women.
anothertoothpick April 3rd, 2016 at 14:45
And it’s a nice day to START AGAIN.
bpollen April 3rd, 2016 at 14:54
That just gave me a mental picture of Trump in Nazi regalia, Melanoma in a wedding gown, SS Storm Troopers throwing rice, all under the heading “White Wedding.”
I think I just assaulted the hell outta Godwin’s Law.
Larry Schmitt April 3rd, 2016 at 15:09
“White Wedding” sounds like a good name for a punk band.
William April 3rd, 2016 at 15:26
In this case I think it’s acceptable.
Larry Schmitt April 3rd, 2016 at 15:27
“I love the poorly educated.”
Roctuna April 3rd, 2016 at 18:49
Is the Billy Idol song providing the soundtrack for this mental picture?
bpollen April 3rd, 2016 at 18:58
Mmmmm…. Could be.
anothertoothpick April 3rd, 2016 at 14:55
Trump got Todd Akined
Gina Bousquet April 3rd, 2016 at 15:00
Why should one be hypothetical and ignore the law?!
jybarz April 3rd, 2016 at 15:33
It’s not hypothetical that you’re a stupid SOB, Tramp.
I think you better stop taking advice from yourself, Big Mouthed BULLSH!T ARTIST!
mistlesuede April 3rd, 2016 at 16:06
Most people who don’t want to answer a hypothetical question simply state that there is no need to answer the question because it is “hypothetical.” That pretty much ends it.
Keep talking Drumpf. You’re helping all of the other candidates.
Mike April 3rd, 2016 at 21:19
It’s the easiest q+a for a fence sitting R that doesn’t want to commit…just tell em it’s a state rights issue and to let the states vote on it…
mistlesuede April 3rd, 2016 at 22:44
Exactly. And it gets very tiring hearing it.
Roctuna April 3rd, 2016 at 18:55
Herr Drumpf and his spin doctors are repeating the lie that the question was framed by “if it’s illegal” When I listen to that interview that’s not what I hear. Chris Matthews just asked him a straight-up question. Should women be punished? Herr Drumpf and his staff have “explained” so many versions and made so many conflicting statements that nobody can make any sense of it and that’s their real goal. His poorly educated base will lose interest and totally ignore the whole thing.
Mike April 3rd, 2016 at 21:16
Drumpf’s spin doctors are more like student interns…
Katherine Middleton April 4th, 2016 at 06:38
When I looked at the draft of 6577 dollars, I have faith that brother of my friend was like really generating cash in his free time with his PC..azz His aunt’s neighbor has done this for only 8 months and by now repaid the loan on their home and bought a new Car.
For Details Click Here
bv…