Bundy and other militia leaders behind bars without bail

Go to article

Posted by | January 30, 2016 10:13 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly

Republish
Reprint


Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

Show Article

30 responses to Bundy and other militia leaders behind bars without bail

  1. eyelashviper January 30th, 2016 at 10:34

    Boo hoo, stuck in jail cells with no snacks, no queen sized 400 thread count sheets, no throw rugs….cruel and unusual punishment for these macho ammosexual welfare queens.

    • Annie January 30th, 2016 at 10:37

      You’d think they’d at least let them have their dildos.

      • Larry Schmitt January 30th, 2016 at 12:21

        That’s what the guns are for.

      • Gina Bousquet January 30th, 2016 at 12:34

        lol

      • rg9rts January 30th, 2016 at 12:49

        They could use them as bayonets

        • Larry Schmitt January 30th, 2016 at 12:49

          Or vice versa.

          • rg9rts January 30th, 2016 at 12:50

            always thinking …did you see the list of demands the hold outs have LOL

    • mistlesuede January 30th, 2016 at 15:19

      No French vanilla creamer. :(

  2. tracey marie January 30th, 2016 at 11:12

    They demanded…hahahaha

  3. Comicus January 30th, 2016 at 11:16

    If one does not want an armed standoff, don’t be armed.

  4. TiredOldGuy January 30th, 2016 at 11:22

    “The reason that we are talking about this now is because of civil disobedience.”
    So, at some point they’re going to equate Bundy with MLK Jr?
    Geeze, whoda thunk?

  5. Carla Akins January 30th, 2016 at 11:44

    I am a huge fan of civil disobedience, it is one of this countries biggest strengths. I think they should be large and loud – and yes, inconvenient. It should close roads, cost people money, and make people angry. Face it, no one will pay attention otherwise and change would never come. But it should never involve weapons and it should never include physical threats, but mostly you have to know that civil disobedience comes with a price. If you are not willing to go to jail for your cause, then it’s really not very important to you. It’s kind of the whole point.

    • TiredOldGuy January 30th, 2016 at 12:07

      I completely agree with your statement on the value and worth of civil disobedience.

      All credibility is immediately lost when the stated goals of the protestors are overthrowing the government of the people by force.

    • rg9rts January 30th, 2016 at 12:48

      bringing weapons into the equation separates it from civil disobedience ….

      • mistlesuede January 30th, 2016 at 15:18

        Apparently, not just guns but explosives.

      • StoneyCurtisll January 30th, 2016 at 17:58

        Bingo!

  6. Larry Schmitt January 30th, 2016 at 12:20

    Never an armed standoff? What the hell is his definition of armed? Every image I saw showed no shortage of firearms.

    • TiredOldGuy January 30th, 2016 at 12:30

      “Patriots” allowed to be armed.
      “Non-patriots” (LEOs, FBI, State Troopers) not allowed to be armed.
      See, that would make it a “not armed standoff”.

      • Larry Schmitt January 30th, 2016 at 12:31

        Also not allowed to be armed: anyone not white.

    • Suzanne McFly January 30th, 2016 at 16:01

      Well the shortage was in their pants.

      • CandideThirtythree January 31st, 2016 at 05:55

        hahahaha I agree Suz and the other shortage was grey matter.

        • Suzanne McFly January 31st, 2016 at 06:13

          Definitely, and I think it is the grey matter that is more important.

  7. rg9rts January 30th, 2016 at 12:46

    Fantasy land…keep them there till Mickey Mouse can come up with bail

  8. Gina Bousquet January 30th, 2016 at 13:07

    Armed occupation has never been civil disobedience

  9. Foundryman January 30th, 2016 at 13:23

    They only call themselves Federalists, or Constitutionalists today because Tim McVeigh used the Sovereign Citizen label. The Bundys and all these anti-government traitors are of the same exact cloth of the sovereign citizens movement.

    Without bail, hopefully will mean they are gone from this side of the wall for at least 25 years.

  10. StoneyCurtisll January 30th, 2016 at 17:54

    Sucks to be a Bundy…

  11. amersham46 January 30th, 2016 at 20:19

    ‘facing a maximum sentence of six years in prison’ not near long enough

  12. Patty K. January 30th, 2016 at 21:58

    Put those ‘Bundy’ egos in check and fade into obscurity.

  13. William January 31st, 2016 at 00:15

    Perfect.

Leave a Reply