NRA Says Obama’s Actions Didn’t Go Far Enough

Posted by | January 5, 2016 15:27 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics

Republish
Reprint


Yes, they say what he did is meaningless “political rhetoric” that wouldn’t have stopped any mass shootings. But if he did more than he was allowed to do he’d overstep his power. So what is the NRA’s solution? They don’t have one, because there is no measure they support.

Once again, President Obama has chosen to engage in political rhetoric, instead of offering meaningful solutions to our nation’s pressing problems.  Today’s event also represents an ongoing attempt to distract attention away from his lack of a coherent strategy to keep the American people safe from terrorist attack.

The American people do not need more emotional, condescending lectures that are completely devoid of facts.  The men and women of the National Rifle Association take a back seat to no one when it comes to keeping our communities safe.  But the fact is that President Obama’s proposals would not have prevented any of the horrific events he mentioned.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

14 responses to NRA Says Obama’s Actions Didn’t Go Far Enough

  1. arc99 January 5th, 2016 at 15:32

    your agenda isn’t stopping the carnage either, so this gun-owning leftist says f*ck off NRA..

  2. Maxx44 January 5th, 2016 at 15:33

    Do they mean he lacks a sound strategy to keep us safe like the one Dubya had? You know, the strategy that resulted in 9/11 and numerous embassy and consulate bombings?

  3. William January 5th, 2016 at 15:46

    **

  4. bpollen January 5th, 2016 at 15:52

    “The men and women of the National Rifle Association take a back seat to no one when it comes to keeping our communities safe.”

    You may not be taking a back seat, but you are apparently driving with your ASS because there have been nearly 500 incidents of gun violence just this year!

  5. Budda January 5th, 2016 at 16:45

    He’s not talking about just mass shootings. How many lives could be saved with tighter background checks?

  6. Suzanne McFly January 5th, 2016 at 16:56

    I have heard some people in the news say this will hurt the NRA or other pro gun organizations if they try to make this a legal issue. If they claim on one hand the President overstepped his bounds while saying on the other hand that these changes don’t amount to much. Glad to see the screw is coming back around.

  7. Tim Coolio January 5th, 2016 at 17:29

    It’s better than nothing.

  8. JoseM4 January 5th, 2016 at 20:11

    Obama’s executive action would not have stopped any recent mass shootings

    • allison1050 January 6th, 2016 at 12:13

      And you know this how Jose? Based on what information?

  9. Foundryman January 5th, 2016 at 21:58

    Responsible gun owners have no problem at all with taking extra precautions to make sure criminals, mentally ill, or rabid militia type nuts cannot get a gun.

  10. jybarz January 6th, 2016 at 01:37

    Don’t NRA/ gun-nuts/ GOP just make your blood boil?
    They make positives negatives.
    And their negatives as positives in their evil minds.
    Please, Lord, change their evil minds to goodness or deliver them to hell.

  11. rg9rts January 6th, 2016 at 03:27

    It seems that the only terrorists that the american people need to fear are the gun totin yahoos that are trigger happy NRA members

Leave a Reply