On Militia Standoff, Only Rubio And Bush Among GOP Candidates Have Said Law Must Be Obeyed

Posted by | January 4, 2016 13:24 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics


Think Progress has a handy list of where the Republican candidates stood on Cliven Bundy’s armed standoff: None of the Republican presidential candidates have weighed in on the rapidly escalating situation, which is certain to become a point of discussion in a heated 2016 election season. However, several current candidates did weigh in on Cliven Bundy’s…

(more…)

By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

8 responses to On Militia Standoff, Only Rubio And Bush Among GOP Candidates Have Said Law Must Be Obeyed

  1. rg9rts January 4th, 2016 at 13:26

    At least some is saying something…not doing the fingers in the ears laalalalalalalala routine

  2. William January 4th, 2016 at 13:30

    If they condemn the YokelHarem bird sanctuary occupiers they risk alienating their gap toothed, mouth breathing base. It’s a bit of a quandary, but fun to watch.

  3. allison1050 January 4th, 2016 at 13:38

    Loved the article!

  4. tracey marie January 4th, 2016 at 13:50

    “cut a deal” we are not a business or a corporation tRump, we are a country.

  5. arc99 January 4th, 2016 at 15:58

    These jokers are too crazy even for crazy far right wingers

    https://www.oathkeepers.org/the-hammond-family-does/

    The Hammond Family Does NOT Want an Armed Stand Off, and Nobody Has a Right to Force One On Them

    • arc99 January 4th, 2016 at 16:00

      and the Church of Latter Day Saints has issued a press release which essentially states, “don’t blame us”

      http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/church-responds-to-inquiries-regarding-oregon-armed-occupation

      While the disagreement occurring in Oregon about the use of federal lands is not a Church matter, Church leaders strongly condemn the armed seizure of the facility and are deeply troubled by the reports that those who have seized the facility suggest that they are doing so based on scriptural principles. This armed occupation can in no way be justified on a scriptural basis. We are privileged to live in a nation where conflicts with government or private groups can — and should — be settled using peaceful means, according to the laws of the land.

  6. FatRat January 4th, 2016 at 16:01

    opportunity for the rancher to “cut a deal” with the government.

    I guess Trump is saying that we should all negotiate with the philosophy of “peace through strength”!

    http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/516W6PY-hvL._SX300_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    http://archive.adl.org/learn/ext_us/images/turner_diaries_cover_small.gif

  7. mistlesuede January 4th, 2016 at 18:50

    I’m sorry. I couldn’t read the piece yet from the tears in my eyes laughing at that caricature picture above! OMG. Can’t stop laughingl Guess I will have to come back to the article. :):)

Leave a Reply