Law Enforcement Analyst: White Militiamen Not A Threat Like Black Protesters Because ‘They’re Not Looting Anything’
And here you have the difference in how the white establishment looks at a bunch of anti-government loons taking over a government building.NN law enforcement analyst Art Roderick said over the weekend that armed protesters who took over a federal building in Oregon were not being treated harshly like Black Lives Matter protesters and Muslims would be because they were “not looting anything.”
…Roderick told CNN host Brian Stelter on Sunday that law enforcement should not react with force to end the militia’s occupation of the federal building…
Stelter pointed out that many activists had complained if the militia members were “Black Lives Matter protesters or if these were peaceful Muslim Americans [then] they would be treated very differently by law enforcement.”
“This is a very rural area,” Roderick replied. “It is out in the middle of nowhere. What are they actually doing? They’re not destroying property, they’re not looting anything.”
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
31 responses to Law Enforcement Analyst: White Militiamen Not A Threat Like Black Protesters Because ‘They’re Not Looting Anything’
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
rg9rts January 4th, 2016 at 09:57
One supposed this idiot condones arson and felony grand theft from the BLM .. must be a gopee and wants only selective law enforcement…those that he likes
veggiedude January 4th, 2016 at 10:34
The real reason is that they don’t want another Waco. Plain and simple. At least in Waco children were suspected of being abused.
Budda January 4th, 2016 at 11:12
They don’t have to storm the gift shop, just starve them out and then arrest their dumb asses!
Dwendt44 January 4th, 2016 at 12:32
They may have stockpiled some food and so forth (toilet paper) since the take over. Still, it’s winter even in Oregon so cutting off the heat, lights and electric and things will get gammy pretty quick. They definitely need to isolate the building so no reinforcements or supplies get in.
Hugh Everett January 4th, 2016 at 16:15
Good job, Ted! The small group of protesters in Oregon are playing into Obama’s hands. He wants a Tim McVeigh Moment where he can portray his political opposition as a bunch of crazy extremists.Let liberals advocate violence against cops with their Black Lives Matter protesters, and look ridiculous with tier Occupy Wall Street kooks. Conservatives need to focus on the real revolution that will occur in 309 days, when we go to the polls to take the few remaining seats held by the democrat party.
arc99 January 4th, 2016 at 11:37
Most right wingers will be too dense to realize that this “analyst” has just confirmed what #BlackLivesMatter has been telling us all along.
When it comes to deadly force, whites are treated differently (and more leniently) than blacks.
The fact that this a$$hole has a reason is entirely irrelevant. Hypocrites always have a “good reason” to justify their double standards.
fahvel January 4th, 2016 at 11:43
aside from oregon doing nothing, these are the kind of comments and actions the entire world is watching.
StoneyCurtisll January 4th, 2016 at 12:03
Bingo~!
StoneyCurtisll January 4th, 2016 at 12:01
How does he know they are not destroying property or looting?
whatthe46 January 4th, 2016 at 12:16
so, it’s ok for white men armed to the teeth, threatening a shoot out, because they are all pissy over criminals having to serve time for what they were convicted of, but, when a black child is murdered for holding a toy gun and threatening NO ONE, and the communtiy comes together to protest, that’s bad. these parasites really don’t hear the b.s. rolling off their filty tongues.
Foundryman January 4th, 2016 at 12:17
I’d much prefer to see these terrorists get a permanent orange jumpsuit than to endure the barrage of right wing hero worshiping propaganda after they are all dead.
anothertoothpick January 4th, 2016 at 12:27
I am looking for the politician that wants to re-purpose this tax payer owned land into low income housing projects.
Starting with the land right next to the to A$$hole Bundy’s ranch.
BillPasadena January 4th, 2016 at 12:33
It’s being reported that Eric Holder was involved in an armed takeover of a federal rotc building at Columbia.
Good thing that armed takeover didn’t prevent Obama from picking him as attorney general.
anothertoothpick January 4th, 2016 at 12:58
…and?
whatthe46 January 4th, 2016 at 12:59
he doesn’t know.
anothertoothpick January 4th, 2016 at 13:04
The “Little Old Man from Pasadena” likes his fox noise. hahahahaha
Gina Bousquet January 4th, 2016 at 13:07
Links or it didn’t happen.
Boltorama January 4th, 2016 at 13:45
Just ignore him. He comes here looking to get attention.
Gina Bousquet January 4th, 2016 at 14:10
Thanks Bolt! :)
arc99 January 4th, 2016 at 14:07
the only links you will find are at right wing blogs.
even they use weasel words like “reportedly” and “allegedly” to obfuscate the reality that they have no objective reliable factual source for the information.
it’s a like the birth certificate without pixel analysis. and even in those blogs, the ROTC facility is described as abandoned.
so thanks to BillPasadena for a classic illustration of right wing hypocrisy and bigotry. only white guys with guns who take over federal facilities are patriots.
Gina Bousquet January 4th, 2016 at 14:11
I suspected if he provided a link it would be from an extreme right-wing source. :)
arc99 January 4th, 2016 at 14:10
from the NY Times December 2008. nothing in the 2nd amendment says the arms you keep and bear have to be guns.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/01/nyregion/01holder.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Mr. Holder’s years at Stuyvesant progressed as opposition to the Vietnam War escalated, but though he opposed the war, he did not actively protest it.
When he arrived at Columbia in 1969 as a boyish-looking freshman, he was recruited by upperclassmen to help take over the R.O.T.C. office. Armed with pillowcases and sheets, he joined several dozen students and christened the office as a student center named for Malcolm X.
Gina Bousquet January 4th, 2016 at 14:14
Thank you so much arc 99, that was really nice! :)
Gindy51 January 4th, 2016 at 13:17
Liar, next.
bpollen January 4th, 2016 at 16:01
Your ass is talking to you again? Musta kissed and made up…
Laura911 January 4th, 2016 at 16:18
Maybe it was an open pillowcase carry state.
FatRat January 4th, 2016 at 16:19
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-6TUM85o2K9E/TYLYj-ONzxI/AAAAAAAABHA/kKOuFU7nuSI/s1600/Pillow-Fighting-Girls-4.jpg
Gindy51 January 4th, 2016 at 13:17
Liar, the fact that they had to break into the building since it was closed = destroying property Some LE ANALyst he is…. More like a LE ANAL CYST.
Boltorama January 4th, 2016 at 13:44
So wrong on many levels I don’t know where to start.
Vlad Pootin January 4th, 2016 at 14:20
SOOO!! Its OK to break the law and have civil disobedience as long as you’re good, christian, rightist, bundy supporters and hate the feds..
What HYPOCRITES…these subversives loath the fed govt until their state needs FEMA $$, then they stampede with palms up to suck the trough dry.
Case and Point…CC and Prez Obama…CC had no problem licking OB’s anal for $$ to ‘shore up’ HIS Jersey Shore.
liberalMD January 5th, 2016 at 00:09
I would never ask this guy to analyze anything ever. His thought processes defy logic.
So law enforcement looks upon the protesters of Black Lives Matter and Muslims adversely because they take something and these white hillybillies in Oregon aren’t taking anything. Well they have taken over a federal building (even if it is a bird sanctuary) and every one of them is carrying a rifle, which can take a human life. I’d say these guys in Oregon are much more dangerous than either of the other two groups.
Let’s face it…..this man and most of law enforcement can look the other way when a white man commits civil disobedience but when a black man or Muslim does it they shoot first and ask questions later. This country has made giant strides backwards in race relations over the past 50 years.