Dispute At Party Preceded Shooting
Authorities are trying to piece together what led to the San Bernardino shooting. It is believed there was a dispute at a holiday party, after which the alleged shooter angrily left and then returned armed.
Jarrod Burguan, San Bernardino police chief, said authorities were investigating reports the shooting might be linked to a disgruntled employee taking part in the party.
“There was some type of dispute or something when somebody left the party, but we have no idea if those are the people that came back,” he said.
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
11 responses to Dispute At Party Preceded Shooting
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Red Mann December 3rd, 2015 at 10:21
It could have been triggered by some incident but the amount of preperation, clothing, weapons, pipe bombs show a considerable amount of planning, not something that could be thrown together in 30 minutes or so. We may never know their motivation since, apparently, they didn’t leave any writings and, of course, they are dead.
Suzanne McFly December 3rd, 2015 at 10:51
They were definitely planning on carrying out some sort of killing spree.
StoneyCurtisll December 3rd, 2015 at 11:18
Gun terrorism…
It doesn’t matter if or what religion is involved…
Larry Schmitt December 3rd, 2015 at 11:31
Why does everyone only consider terrorism in connection to Muslims, and the radical ideals? Regardless of the reasons they did it, I think everyone was pretty well terrified, and the fact they were Muslim may have nothing to do with it. Some people are just looking for another reason to blame and demonize all Muslims.
whatthe46 December 3rd, 2015 at 13:49
you’re absolutely right.
veggiedude December 3rd, 2015 at 17:53
because thinking is hard to do
disqus_Va4LwroE3I December 3rd, 2015 at 11:55
He must have gotten a really bad secret santa gift! I bet Marge from Accounting made him a Jesus knitted oven mitt.
fedele December 3rd, 2015 at 14:11
“we have no idea if those are the people that came back” – Wouldn’t the people at the party be able to answer that question? Are all the people at the party dead? Are they asking the right questions and are these questions being asked to the right people? It seems as if “the alleged shooters” have the right names to go with the agenda they’re trying to piece together. How long ago did they buy these weapons, who bought them? Why did the brother-in-law mention and respond to the male and not say anything about his sister? Has the mother they were living with been questioned? Too much to know before making any sort of theory. The truth may never be known as they are dead. I don’t care what the FBI declares as “terrorism”. If you are the perpetrator, if your actions cause groups of people to run for their life in fear, if survival is their main concern, YOU are a terrorist, no matter what the motive.
veggiedude December 3rd, 2015 at 14:25
Not all people at the party would know about this problem. The shooter may have been upset with only one person (like the boss).
JMax December 3rd, 2015 at 15:05
I think it’s possible that the “argument” at the party was a “false flag” of sorts on the part of the perpetrators. It doesn’t make sense that somebody would have an argument and leave then come back decked out in tactical gear and masks even IF they were planning the attack all along. I think the “argument” was meant to throw police off on who the perp was. It was a bad plan made worse by going back to a house at a known address where the police would quickly find them….based on the only lead they really had.
Snick1946 December 4th, 2015 at 11:24
I saw the widow of one victim being interviewed, saying her husband was a ‘martyr’. He was apparently a militant Jew who’d had strong disagreements with the shooter in the past. It sounded to me as if these two might have clashed at the party. Have not seen anything abut this since.