Anonymous Takes The Hoods Off The KKK After Threats Of ‘Lethal Force’ On Ferguson Protesters

Posted by | November 15, 2014 09:30 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Top Stories

Republish
Reprint


With tension already on the rise while waiting for the Grand Jury decision to be handed down in the case of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, the KKK has promised to use “lethal force” against protesters.

That didn’t go down well with Anonymous, so the loosely-knit Internet collective has responded in the best way possible, taking the hoods off of Klan members.

The irony here is palpable.

Anonymous members are masked while ripping the hoods off of Klan members who promise violence against protesters who are exercising their right to free speech.

KKK sites are being DDOSed, faces are exposed and the Klan’s 1-800 number is being trolled.

Watch [UPDATE – YouTube had removed the video due to what they claim is a violation of their policies, but you can’t keep a good video down]:

 

 

Hands up, hoods off.  Faces of the Klan. 

The KKK should have expected them.

Update:

Frank Ancona is officially doxxed, holla!

Send me any new tweets of Klan members being de-hooded and I’ll add them here. Give the Anons some love using the #OpKKK hashtag. 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100

1,229 responses to Anonymous Takes The Hoods Off The KKK After Threats Of ‘Lethal Force’ On Ferguson Protesters

  1. searambler November 15th, 2014 at 09:39

    The most awesomest thing on the internet today!

  2. mea_mark November 15th, 2014 at 09:39

    It will be interesting to see how many police officers are exposed as KKK members. It is way past time to expose these people.

    • Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 11:17

      whole bunches in the deep south and other places.

    • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 11:40

      I agree. I wonder how many of the white cops actually live in the towns where they work. It should be a requirement.

      • Carla Akins November 15th, 2014 at 13:47

        It is here in Kansas City for anyone that gets paid by the city. From the mayor to the janitor, fire and police. I just assumed it was everywhere, until a few years ago.

        • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 19:53

          I live remote, so the cops are our neighbors, friends and customers. I had a friend years ago who joined the SF Pd, and it was a requirement then. I guess it must be left up to the community.

          • rwgate November 17th, 2014 at 14:47

            Most cities I’ve lived in, Seattle, Denver, Phoenix, have laws that require any public servant to live within the boundaries of the city. This includes firefighters, police officers, and teachers. However, I can see where one might feel that it is safer to live somewhere else (particularly for police officers) where your interaction with the community might put you at some risk. Not sure if I’d agree.

            • M D Reese November 17th, 2014 at 14:50

              Yes–and if their interactions are adversarial, then they have a much larger problem. I think that is what the laws are meant to encourage–beiong a part of and invested in the community that you police and protect.

      • m2old4bs November 15th, 2014 at 14:10

        Actually, it is considered safer for a LEO to live in a nearby town rather than the town that he serves as a LEO. Rule of thumb I’ve been told is to live 30 minutes to an hour away from work. Less chance of running into people you’ve busted/ticketed while going about living life, i.e. going to the store, post office, doctor’s, church, etc. But, then I’m not a LEO, so what do I know.

        • Carla Akins November 15th, 2014 at 14:22

          If they live in the community they work, they have a vested interest in succeeding. It’s better for the community.

        • William November 15th, 2014 at 14:41

          Although I admit I was more rural than urban, I not only lived in the town I served in, but was and still am in the phone book. My belief is simple. I won’t have a job that means I have to hide, and I won’t hide just to have a job.
          I think it’s about respect. During my 16 years in LE I was only called at home once. A shoplifter wanted to know if it was ok for her to go back to the store she was banned from.
          If you respect people and remember that they are innocent until proven guilty, I think that helps.
          When I was taking someone to jail I would remind them of that.
          I would always tell them that it’s not personal, and that nobody is guilty just because a cop thinks they are. I just don’t have that kind of wisdom. That’s up to a court.
          I would also strongly recommend they get a lawyer, and furnish them the toll free number for the bar association referral line.
          I think some lawyers found it a bit disarming when a client would tell them a cop recommended their services.
          I didn’t originate these standards. I learned from a Sgt who was respected by criminals and lawyers alike. Indeed, I spoke at his funeral, and noticed the first row was mostly defense attorneys.
          Respect is something that can take a career to earn, but only a moment to lose.

        • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 19:50

          I live on a remote island–so we all pretty much know everybody who lives here. The cops are our neighbors, friends, and customers.

  3. searambler November 15th, 2014 at 10:39

    The most awesomest thing on the internet today!

  4. mea_mark November 15th, 2014 at 10:39

    It will be interesting to see how many police officers are exposed as KKK members. It is way past time to expose these people.

    • Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 12:17

      whole bunches in the deep south and other places.

    • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 12:40

      I agree. I wonder how many of the white cops actually live in the towns where they work. It should be a requirement.

      • Carla Akins November 15th, 2014 at 14:47

        It is here in Kansas City for anyone that gets paid by the city. From the mayor to the janitor, fire and police. I just assumed it was everywhere, until a few years ago.

        • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 20:53

          I live remote, so the cops are our neighbors, friends and customers. I had a friend years ago who joined the SF Pd, and it was a requirement then. I guess it must be left up to the community.

          • rwgate November 17th, 2014 at 15:47

            Most cities I’ve lived in, Seattle, Denver, Phoenix, have laws that require any public servant to live within the boundaries of the city. This includes firefighters, police officers, and teachers. However, I can see where one might feel that it is safer to live somewhere else (particularly for police officers) where your interaction with the community might put you at some risk. Not sure if I’d agree.

            • M D Reese November 17th, 2014 at 15:50

              Yes–and if their interactions are adversarial, then they have a much larger problem. I think that is what the laws are meant to encourage–beiong a part of and invested in the community that you police and protect.

      • m2old4bs November 15th, 2014 at 15:10

        Actually, it is considered safer for a LEO to live in a nearby town rather than the town that he serves as a LEO. Rule of thumb I’ve been told is to live 30 minutes to an hour away from work. Less chance of running into people you’ve busted/ticketed while going about living life, i.e. going to the store, post office, doctor’s, church, etc. But, then I’m not a LEO, so what do I know.

        • Carla Akins November 15th, 2014 at 15:22

          If they live in the community they work, they have a vested interest in succeeding. It’s better for the community.

        • William November 15th, 2014 at 15:41

          Although I admit I was more rural than urban, I not only lived in the town I served in, but was and still am in the phone book. My belief is simple. I won’t have a job that means I have to hide, and I won’t hide just to have a job.
          I think it’s about respect. During my 16 years in LE I was only called at home once. A shoplifter wanted to know if it was ok for her to go back to the store she was banned from.
          If you respect people and remember that they are innocent until proven guilty, I think that helps.
          When I was taking someone to jail I would remind them of that.
          I would always tell them that it’s not personal, and that nobody is guilty just because a cop thinks they are. I just don’t have that kind of wisdom. That’s up to a court.
          I would also strongly recommend they get a lawyer, and furnish them the toll free number for the bar association referral line.
          I think some lawyers found it a bit disarming when a client would tell them a cop recommended their services.
          I didn’t originate these standards. I learned from a Sgt who was respected by criminals and lawyers alike. Indeed, I spoke at his funeral, and noticed the first row was mostly defense attorneys.
          Respect is something that can take a career to earn, but only a moment to lose.

        • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 20:50

          I live on a remote island–so we all pretty much know everybody who lives here. The cops are our neighbors, friends, and customers.

  5. fenraven November 15th, 2014 at 09:54

    *applauds*

  6. fenraven November 15th, 2014 at 10:54

    *applauds*

  7. Republicans_are_Evil November 15th, 2014 at 10:41

    How do you join an organization like Anonymous?

  8. Republicans_are_Evil November 15th, 2014 at 11:41

    How do you join an organization like Anonymous?

  9. theysaidwhat November 15th, 2014 at 11:10

    “With tension already on the rise while waiting for the Grand Jury decision to be handed down in the case of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, the KKK has promised to use “lethal force” against protesters.”

    Funny how they choose to spin what was said. When you say “promised to use “lethal force” against protestors.” you attempt to imply that they are simply going to use it regardless. That is not what was written/said in the slightest. What was written was “We will use lethal force as provided under Missouri law to defend ourselves” and then they proceeded to quote the statute. Since when is a person not allowed to claim they will protect their life within the state guidelines an issue? The only “promise” here is that the “peaceful protestors” better be prepared if they decide to be less than peaceful.

    • Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 11:16

      So you gonna be on the KKK side if it comes to a fight? just asking.

      • Foundryman November 15th, 2014 at 11:21

        He’ll be a thousand miles away hiding in his mom’s basement scared shitless.

    • Foundryman November 15th, 2014 at 11:18

      It’ll be great fun to watch you hooded buffoons run down to Ferguson to “keep the peace”…I hope you will be standing guard in front of all the black owned stores on the main street. Make sure your have your hoods on.

    • Anomaly 100 November 15th, 2014 at 11:26

      The KKK is not welcome here!

    • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 11:36

      Past experience shows that all they really want to do is to go out and bust heads–blah heads only, of course.

    • tracey marie November 15th, 2014 at 12:06

      go back to the klavern and wait to be outed with all your inbred buddies and their haggs

    • William November 15th, 2014 at 13:32

      Hood, new Disqus ID, *sigh*. Keyboard Rambo, no threat to anyone. The fundemental difference between the Klan and the protestors is that the protestors have the grapes to show their faces.

  10. theysaidwhat November 15th, 2014 at 12:10

    “With tension already on the rise while waiting for the Grand Jury decision to be handed down in the case of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, the KKK has promised to use “lethal force” against protesters.”

    Funny how they choose to spin what was said. When you say “promised to use “lethal force” against protestors.” you attempt to imply that they are simply going to use it regardless. That is not what was written/said in the slightest. What was written was “We will use lethal force as provided under Missouri law to defend ourselves” and then they proceeded to quote the statute. Since when is a person not allowed to claim they will protect their life within the state guidelines an issue? The only “promise” here is that the “peaceful protestors” better be prepared if they decide to be less than peaceful.

    • Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 12:16

      So you gonna be on the KKK side if it comes to a fight? just asking.

      • Foundryman November 15th, 2014 at 12:21

        He’ll be a thousand miles away hiding in his mom’s basement scared shitless.

    • Foundryman November 15th, 2014 at 12:18

      It’ll be great fun to watch you hooded buffoons run down to Ferguson to “keep the peace”…I hope you will be standing guard in front of all the black owned stores on the main street. Make sure your have your hoods on.

    • StoneyCurtisll November 15th, 2014 at 12:20

      Troll account.
      then votes its single comment up under guest.

    • Anomaly 100 November 15th, 2014 at 12:26

      The KKK is not welcome here! Your ‘new’ Disqus account is duly noted. Take the hood off.

    • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 12:36

      Past experience shows that all they really want to do is to go out and bust heads–blah heads only, of course.

    • tracey marie November 15th, 2014 at 13:06

      go back to the klavern and wait to be outed with all your inbred buddies and their haggs

    • William November 15th, 2014 at 14:32

      Hood, new Disqus ID, *sigh*. Keyboard Rambo, no threat to anyone. The difference between the Klan and the protestors is that the protestors have the grapes to show their faces.

  11. Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 11:18

    LOVE IT…………

  12. Kim Serrahn November 15th, 2014 at 12:18

    LOVE IT…………

  13. Jake November 15th, 2014 at 11:32

    I was trying to add some to this post but every time I refresh the page more and more appear. I have never been a big fan of Anonymous – but this is fantastic. Just go to Twitter and search for #opKKK #HoodsOff . Its gonna be a long and enlightening weekend.

  14. M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 11:33

    Good! I hope this is a permanent function of Anonymous. I’d love to see a site where you could go and look up Klan members in any given town. It’s very similar to having a public list of registered sex offenders. It’s good to know who and where they are.

    • CherMoe November 15th, 2014 at 12:55

      They are all over the country, not just the South. I recently saw a graphic and was surprised to see at least a couple in the northern states. The vast majority are in the red states.

      • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 12:59

        Exactly–that’s what I meant–a national data base where you could look them up.

  15. M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 12:33

    Good! I hope this is a permanent function of Anonymous. I’d love to see a site where you could go and look up Klan members in any given town. It’s very similar to having a public list of registered sex offenders. It’s good to know who and where they are.

    • CherMoe November 15th, 2014 at 13:55

      They are all over the country, not just the South. I recently saw a graphic and was surprised to see at least a couple in the northern states. The vast majority are in the red states.

      • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 13:59

        Exactly–that’s what I meant–a national data base where you could look them up.

  16. TheTsunamiofKarma November 15th, 2014 at 11:38

    Gosh, all the media slant against Anonymous over the years looks pretty stupid now, eh? :)

    • TheScienceEnthusiast1130 November 15th, 2014 at 16:39

      Yes :D

  17. TheTsunamiofKarma November 15th, 2014 at 12:38

    Gosh, all the media slant against Anonymous over the years looks pretty stupid now, eh? :)

    • TheScienceEnthusiast1130 November 15th, 2014 at 17:39

      Yes :D

  18. Ross Peeler November 15th, 2014 at 11:49

    Yawn…

    • Anomaly 100 November 15th, 2014 at 11:53

      Speaking of ‘yawn’, I just read your comment history…

      • Ross Peeler November 16th, 2014 at 04:56

        Wasn’t aware my comment history was the main subject here. Thanks for playing.

    • Jake November 15th, 2014 at 11:53

      Sitting comfortably there are we? They’ll never get to you! You’re quite sure about that?

    • pitchdove November 15th, 2014 at 11:59

      Mmmmhmm I just bet you are.

    • tracey marie November 15th, 2014 at 12:02

      lol,you are next to be exposed as the LOSER you are.

    • Casey Kohler November 15th, 2014 at 12:09

      Hows that heart disease coming along there? Hope you can keep up on the front lines with us youngins. We’ll be sure not to go easy on you. *bang bang* ;)

    • Lib_IN_YOUR_FACE November 15th, 2014 at 12:11

      Yes. I have read your comments as well.

      Yawning is a sign of a lack of oxygen in the brain. I am not surprised as that is pretty much the constant state of a person suffering from cranial-anal reversal.

      • JustaSlob November 15th, 2014 at 13:15

        HA!! nicely done…

      • TheScienceEnthusiast1130 November 15th, 2014 at 16:38

        lol

      • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 16:59

        I read a few of them too. I think you give Peeler way too much credit.

  19. Ross Peeler November 15th, 2014 at 12:49

    Yawn…

    • Anomaly 100 November 15th, 2014 at 12:53

      Speaking of ‘yawn’, I just read your comment history…

      • Ross Peeler November 16th, 2014 at 05:56

        Wasn’t aware my comment history was the main subject here. Thanks for playing.

    • pitchdove November 15th, 2014 at 12:59

      Mmmmhmm I just bet you are.

    • tracey marie November 15th, 2014 at 13:02

      lol,you are next to be exposed as the LOSER you are.

    • Lib_IN_YOUR_FACE November 15th, 2014 at 13:11

      Yes. I have read your comments as well.

      Yawning is a sign of a lack of oxygen in the brain. I am not surprised as that is pretty much the constant state of a person suffering from cranial-anal reversal.

      • JustaSlob November 15th, 2014 at 14:15

        HA!! nicely done…

      • TheScienceEnthusiast1130 November 15th, 2014 at 17:38

        lol

      • M D Reese November 15th, 2014 at 17:59

        I read a few of them too. I think you give Peeler way too much credit.

  20. tracey marie November 15th, 2014 at 12:05

    why are all the women fat and the men filthy dirty?

    • Casey Kohler November 15th, 2014 at 12:07

      Because they are hoosier white trash, and they’ll be handled.

    • Mr. Jon November 16th, 2014 at 21:35

      Because fat fucks and filthy hillbillies use it to deflect their anger.

1 2 3 … 11

Leave a Reply