Michael Brown Autopsy Is In: Ferguson Teenager Was Shot At Least 6 Times
The anticipated autopsy report for Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer last week, is in. The 18-year-old was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found.
Baden testified in the trials of O.J. Simpson, Phil Spector and Drew Peterson.
The New York Times reports:
One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.
The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
“People have been asking: How many times was he shot? This information could have been released on Day 1,” Dr. Baden said in an interview after performing the autopsy. “They don’t do that, even as feelings built up among the citizenry that there was a cover-up. We are hoping to alleviate that.”
Dr. Baden said that even though Brown was shot at least six times, only three bullets were recovered from his body. But Baden has not yet seen the X-rays showing where the bullets were found, which would clarify the autopsy results. In addition, he had not had access to witness and police statements.
Dr. aden provided a diagram of the entry wounds, and noted that the six shots produced numerous wounds. Some of the bullets entered and exited several times, including one that left at least five different wounds.
“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”
Dr. Baden did not assign blame in this case. He said,“We need more information; for example, the police should be examining the automobile to see if there is gunshot residue in the police car.”
The police shooting of Michael Brown has sparked protests in Ferguson, Missouri, besieging the city with a militarized police force, looting, violence, arrests and a police force that has not been forthcoming.
Image: New York Times
Click here for reuse options!Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
94 responses to Michael Brown Autopsy Is In: Ferguson Teenager Was Shot At Least 6 Times
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Obewon August 18th, 2014 at 00:32
Unarmed teenager Michael Brown was shot at least six times for jaywalking from 33 feet away! Shooter Darren Wilson should be charged, tried, convicted and imprisoned where he will no longer remain a danger to society for the rest of his natural life. Good luck in the joint Klansman…
Obewon August 18th, 2014 at 00:32
Unarmed teenager Michael Brown was shot at least six times for jaywalking from 33 feet away! There are many great police officers, unlike shooter Darren Wilson who should be charged, tried, convicted and imprisoned where he will no longer remain a danger to society for the rest of his natural life. Good luck in the joint Klansman.
labman57 August 18th, 2014 at 01:00
Best case scenario for Wilson? He panicked and negligently unloaded his firearm into an unarmed (large scary black) young man who was not being compliant with his commands regarding walking on the sidewalk.
Worse case scenario? The Ferguson police force routinely targeted the black community for harassment and intimidation, and in an act of rage … Wilson deliberately blew the kid away simply because the young man pissed him off.
labman57 August 18th, 2014 at 01:00
Best case scenario for Wilson? He panicked and negligently unloaded his firearm into an unarmed (large scary black) young man who was not being compliant with his commands regarding walking on the sidewalk.
Worse case scenario? The Ferguson police force routinely targeted the black community for harassment and intimidation, and in an act of rage … Wilson deliberately blew the kid away simply because the young man pissed him off.
fancypants August 18th, 2014 at 02:59
Ferguson police findings: after further review, our officer told mr.wilson to get away from the squad car 6 times. He didn’t respond after that.
Any questions ?
fancypants August 18th, 2014 at 02:59
Ferguson police findings: after further review, our officer told mr.wilson to get away from the squad car 6 times. He didn’t respond after that.
Any questions ?
Tom Ward August 18th, 2014 at 03:13
“all the bullets were fired into his front.”
That’s pretty much contrary to everything I’ve heard so far.
MiAtheistGal August 18th, 2014 at 06:50
I read that differently. I read that as all four of the bullets to his arm were from the front. Huh. Wonder what was really meant by that now.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 15:48
there’s one shot to the arm where baden can’t tell if its when he was shot from the back (not literally) but meaning while his back was turned or when he was facing him and his arm was raised.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 09:22
All six bullets entered the front, corroborating new (and accidental) eyewitness account that Brown turned toward the officer and came at him.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 11:07
Take another look at the drawing, RJ. See how the arms are drawn, with what you might call the “inside” of the arm, the part that doesn’t tan as much, facing forward, and open palms facing forward?
That’s not how we humans carry our arms when walking, standing or running, so it’s incorrect to conclude that the entry wounds on the right arm demonstrate that the victim was “coming at” the officer. If that were the case, we’d be seeing entry wounds on the “back” of the arm (as shown in the second diagram).
It gets worse:
If he was running away from the officer, as some witnesses have claimed, then that would fit with the wounds to the right arm.
If he was facing the officer with his hands outstretched above his head in a gesture of surrender, then these wounds would indicate that he was facing the officer.
You see the problem here, I hope. The only thing I can conclude from the drawing is that he was not shot in the back.
Oh, and that Officer Wilson can’t shoot fer shit.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 11:52
“Oh, and that Officer Wilson can’t shoot fer shit.”
That’s the sentiment I heard the latest eyewitness to the event, caught on video: “He keeps missing him, I thought.”
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 12:04
Serious, or is this that “satire” I keep hearing about?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:06
I’m trying to find raw video. The “embedded” video source (that I shared with Miss A) is from a conservative site, and I don’t want to “taint the message” to this particular audience.
However, there is a video taken at the time, with the crowd milling about and people going “Oh my god” and stuff — and the camera picked up conversation of a person standing near the camera talking about Brown turning and charging, with the officer shooting repeatedly and the commenter saying “And I thought, man, he keeps missing him.”
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 17:21
We talking about this one?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:23
No. This one.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 18:10
Jeez, it takes a lot of re-interpretation to get the rambling account of this guy to comport with that given by Officer Wilson’s friend, which was the story as told to her by the copper’s “significant other,” who related the story told by Wilson himself.
For starters, “charging” is not what the fella says Michael is doing, it’s what the twitter account holder says he is saying in order to make it more closely match Wilson’s story. That’s just dirty pool.
Oddly, no mention of any shots fired as Michael is walking away, or of Michael being grazed by a bullet causing him to turn, which sort of puts his account in direct contradiction to that of Piaget Crenshaw.
Meh, a mess. The s/n ratio of this account is just too damn low.
Delightful commenters at that site by the way, lovely people, all of them.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 17:44
if that’s the case, i would gather with being hit, if first from behind then turning around, he was pissed. as anyone would be. one could still argue his hands were up running and yelling at him. then the other shots happened. but, it also goes against this cop as well. “And I thought, man, he keeps missing him.” that would suggest to me that brown was far away from the cop and that’s why you won’t find gun resude on him or likely his clothing. with all those shots being fired and the 2 to the head, with 1 being on the top of his head, were when brown finally went down because of the other wounds he received first.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:58
That’s a plausible interpretation of the conversation. Although the speaker seemed pretty surprised that the officer was missing, which would indicate to me that the range might have been closer — sort of a “Geez, he’s not that far away, how can you miss him?” sort of response.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 18:05
about to run to Sonic, so i won’t repond for another 15min. or so, but, brown was found 35 ft away from the car right?
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 15:47
“Dr. Michael Baden during the autopsy, said a bullet graze wound on Brown’s right arm could have occurred in several ways. The teen may have had his back to the shooter, or he could have been facing the shooter with his hands above his head or in a defensive position across his face or chest, Parcells said.” so, there was not a shot in his “back” but, it doesn’t mean by baden’s report, that his back was not turned. he was found 35 feet away from the cops car where he died. as witness account suggest and it makes sense, if he’s running from this “cop” and the first shot stunned him, he would turn around with his hands up. shots keep coming, it would also make sense that he was bending over as suggested by baden when the one entry was to the top of his head, because he was falling over. what i can’t seem to figure out is the entry that’s shown to be in the right eye, then its exit and reentry into the chin and neck.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:04
what i can’t seem to figure out is the entry that’s shown to be in the right eye, then its exit and reentry into the chin and neck.
Although it’s not entirely clear, it looks like the diagram is trying to describe entry at eye, traveling downward, exit slightly behind lower mandible, re-entry at right clavicle. Perhaps a ricochet off the interior of the skull after entry at the eye.
How’d I do, medical examiners?
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:12
good job. that would indicate that both shots to the head are when he was going down which makes absolute sense. it doesn’t make sense that he was charging. 6. 6. for jaywalking.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:21
I’ll add credence to your hypothesis: the wound to the right hand could have been caused by the same bullet that entered the top of his head, had he been kneeling with his hands on his head.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 15:04
The two shots to the head are the most telling. Baden said that they had a towards the front of the body after they entered. Being that Mike Brown was 6’8″ the only way in my mind that they could have that path is if Browns head was below the muzzle of the gun. Now think how he would be standing or Kneeling for that to happen. Of course the officer might have been on a step ladder in back of him as well.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:15
Or he could have been bowing his head, or falling forward. Lots of room for speculation here.
Also Ed writes: Mike Brown was 6’8″
Dude get taller every day. Last time I looked he was 6’4″. Jeez, big fella, 292 lbs.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 16:25
I thought I saw 6’8″ but in any case for those bullets to follow that path his head had to be below the shooters waist.
Also a friend of the shooter has stated the gun went off while Brown was struggling w/the shooter yet there is no residue on Browns skin.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:34
As Michael Baden pointed out, the possibility remains that there may be residue on his clothing (which Baden did not examine) to support this.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:59
i doubt there will be any residue on the clothing either.
edmeyer_able August 19th, 2014 at 12:13
Just spitballin here but none on his hands which were supposedly within inches of the muzzle.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:35
lol
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:02
Another option for the position — and it’s only an option — is that he was charging.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 17:16
What was the distance when shooting started and wasn’t shooter closing distance between them? Seems like he could have covered that distance in a matter of seconds.IDK.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:19
That’s a number that forensics will have to determine (and we’ll probably have three different sets, since we have three different autopsies being conducted).
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 17:29
Darren Wilson is relating his version of the event thru a friend in the media. The prosecutor needs to bring him before a judge and demand he write an incident report or issue a gag order since everything he says right now is hear-say and can be later denied.
raincheck August 18th, 2014 at 19:03
So he was charging the officer, as the officer was charging him? Some eyewitnesses said when the officer got out of the car he went after him and kept shooting…
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 20:40
Could be both. The hypothetical above is only to provide a possibility for his head being down.
JeffreyPtr August 18th, 2014 at 19:46
Perhaps falling? I don’t know what the rate of fire is for the weapon the officer had. If it were an automatic it could fire 6 shots in a surprisingly short time. It could easily be that a wounded Mr. Brown stumbled forward and the last shots entered higher on his body. The only fact we really know at this point is that we don’t know all the facts.
raincheck August 18th, 2014 at 19:05
I wonder if all the autopsy’s will reveal the same information.. how do they compare with each other?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 20:45
That’s what I’m waiting to hear. Also full autopsy reports, not these partial ones.
edmeyer_able August 19th, 2014 at 12:15
Except for one to the forearm which could have been the shot the made Mike turn around and put his hands in the air.
mcalleyboy October 9th, 2014 at 21:22
I was for warned in my carry concealed weapons course that this is a serious issue with witnesses, they go for the 5 minutes of fame or comment on something they see immediately after shots are fired or they heard the events but actually didn’t see them as they occurred, puts innocent people in prison for years.
Tom Ward August 18th, 2014 at 03:13
“all the bullets were fired into his front.”
That’s pretty much contrary to everything I’ve heard so far.
MiAtheistGal August 18th, 2014 at 06:50
I read that differently. I read that as all four of the bullets to his arm were from the front. Huh. Wonder what was really meant by that now.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 15:48
there’s one shot to the arm where baden can’t tell if its when he was shot from the back (not literally) but meaning while his back was turned or when he was facing him and his arm was raised.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 09:22
All six bullets entered the front, corroborating new (and accidental) eyewitness account that Brown turned toward the officer and came at him.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 11:07
Take another look at the drawing, RJ. See how the arms are drawn, with what you might call the “inside” of the arm, the part that doesn’t tan as much, facing forward, and open palms facing forward?
That’s not how we humans carry our arms when walking, standing or running, so it’s incorrect to conclude that the entry wounds on the right arm demonstrate that the victim was “coming at” the officer. If that were the case, we’d be seeing entry wounds on the “back” of the arm (as shown in the second diagram).
It gets worse:
If he was running away from the officer, as some witnesses have claimed, then that would fit with the wounds to the right arm.
If he was facing the officer with his hands outstretched above his head in a gesture of surrender, then these wounds would indicate that he was facing the officer.
You see the problem here, I hope. The only thing I can conclude from the drawing is that he was not shot in the back.
Oh, and that Officer Wilson can’t shoot fer shit.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 11:52
“Oh, and that Officer Wilson can’t shoot fer shit.”
That’s the sentiment I heard the latest eyewitness to the event, caught on video: “He keeps missing him, I thought.”
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 12:04
Serious, or is this that “satire” I keep hearing about?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:06
I’m trying to find raw video. The “embedded” video source (that I shared with Miss A) is from a conservative site, and I don’t want to “taint the message” to this particular audience.
However, there is a video taken at the time, with the crowd milling about and people going “Oh my god” and stuff — and the camera picked up conversation of a person standing near the camera talking about Brown turning and charging, with the officer shooting repeatedly and the commenter saying “And I thought, man, he keeps missing him.”
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 17:21
We talking about this one?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:23
No. This one.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 18:10
Jeez, it takes a lot of re-interpretation to get the rambling account of this guy to comport with that given by Officer Wilson’s friend, which was the story as told to her by the copper’s “significant other,” who related the story told by Wilson himself.
For starters, “charging” is not what the fella says Michael is doing, it’s what the twitter account holder says he is saying in order to make it more closely match Wilson’s story. That’s just dirty pool.
Oddly, no mention of any shots fired as Michael is walking away, or of Michael being grazed by a bullet causing him to turn, which sort of puts his account in direct contradiction to that of Piaget Crenshaw.
Meh, a mess. The s/n ratio of this account is just too damn low.
Delightful commenters at that site by the way, lovely people, all of them.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 17:44
if that’s the case, i would gather with being hit, if first from behind then turning around, he was pissed. as anyone would be. one could still argue his hands were up running and yelling at him. the diagram shows the shots to the inside of the arm, which would indicate to me his arms were up. then the other shots happened. but, it also goes against this cop as well. “And I thought, man, he keeps missing him.” that would suggest to me that brown was far away from the cop and that’s why you won’t find gun resude on him or likely his clothing. with all those shots being fired and the 2 to the head, with 1 being on the top of his head, were when brown finally went down because of the other wounds he received first.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:58
That’s a plausible interpretation of the conversation. Although the speaker seemed pretty surprised that the officer was missing, which would indicate to me that the range might have been closer — sort of a “Geez, he’s not that far away, how can you miss him?” sort of response.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 18:05
about to run to Sonic, so i won’t repond for another 15min. or so, but, brown was found 35 ft away from the car right?
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 15:47
“Dr. Michael Baden during the autopsy, said a bullet graze wound on Brown’s right arm could have occurred in several ways. The teen may have had his back to the shooter, or he could have been facing the shooter with his hands above his head or in a defensive position across his face or chest, Parcells said.” so, there was not a shot in his “back” but, it doesn’t mean by baden’s report, that his back was not turned. he was found 35 feet away from the cops car where he died. as witness account suggest and it makes sense, if he’s running from this “cop” and the first shot stunned him, he would turn around with his hands up. shots keep coming, it would also make sense that he was bending over as suggested by baden when the one entry was to the top of his head, because he was falling over. what i can’t seem to figure out is the entry that’s shown to be in the right eye, then its exit and reentry into the chin and neck.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:04
what i can’t seem to figure out is the entry that’s shown to be in the right eye, then its exit and reentry into the chin and neck.
Although it’s not entirely clear, it looks like the diagram is trying to describe entry at eye, traveling downward, exit slightly behind lower mandible, re-entry at right clavicle. Perhaps a ricochet off the interior of the skull after entry at the eye.
How’d I do, medical examiners?
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:12
good job. that would indicate that both shots to the head are when he was going down which makes absolute sense. it doesn’t make sense that he was charging. 6. 6. for jaywalking.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:21
I’ll add credence to your hypothesis: the wound to the right hand could have been caused by the same bullet that entered the top of his head, had he been kneeling with his hands on his head.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 15:04
The two shots to the head are the most telling. Baden said that they had a towards the front of the body after they entered. Being that Mike Brown was 6’8″ the only way in my mind that they could have that path is if Browns head was below the muzzle of the gun. Now think how he would be standing or Kneeling for that to happen. Of course the officer might have been on a step ladder in back of him as well.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:15
Or he could have been bowing his head, or falling forward. Lots of room for speculation here.
Also Ed writes: Mike Brown was 6’8″
Dude get taller every day. Last time I looked he was 6’4″. Jeez, big fella, 292 lbs.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 16:25
I thought I saw 6’8″ but in any case for those bullets to follow that path his head had to be below the shooters waist.
Just googled it and Mike was 6-4
Also a friend of the shooter has stated the gun went off while Brown was struggling w/the shooter yet there is no residue on Browns skin.
ChrisVosburg August 18th, 2014 at 16:34
As Michael Baden pointed out, the possibility remains that there may be residue on his clothing (which Baden did not examine) to support this.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:59
i doubt there will be any residue on the clothing either.
edmeyer_able August 19th, 2014 at 12:13
Just spitballin here but none on his hands which were supposedly within inches of the muzzle.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 16:35
lol
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:02
Another option for the position — and it’s only an option — is that he was charging.
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 17:16
What was the distance when shooting started and wasn’t shooter closing distance between them? Seems like he could have covered that distance in a matter of seconds.IDK.
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 17:19
That’s a number that forensics will have to determine (and we’ll probably have three different sets, since we have three different autopsies being conducted).
edmeyer_able August 18th, 2014 at 17:29
Darren Wilson is relating his version of the event thru a friend in the media. The prosecutor needs to bring him before a judge and demand he write an incident report or issue a gag order since everything he says right now is hear-say and can be later denied.
raincheck August 18th, 2014 at 19:03
So he was charging the officer, as the officer was charging him? Some eyewitnesses said when the officer got out of the car he went after him and kept shooting…
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 20:40
Could be both. The hypothetical above is only to provide a possibility for his head being down.
JeffreyPtr August 18th, 2014 at 19:46
Perhaps falling? I don’t know what the rate of fire is for the weapon the officer had. If it were an automatic it could fire 6 shots in a surprisingly short time. It could easily be that a wounded Mr. Brown stumbled forward and the last shots entered higher on his body. The only fact we really know at this point is that we don’t know all the facts.
raincheck August 18th, 2014 at 19:05
I wonder if all the autopsy’s will reveal the same information.. how do they compare with each other?
R.J. Carter August 18th, 2014 at 20:45
That’s what I’m waiting to hear. Also full autopsy reports, not these partial ones.
edmeyer_able August 19th, 2014 at 12:15
Except for one to the forearm which could have been the shot the made Mike turn around and put his hands in the air.
M.C.A. October 9th, 2014 at 21:22
I was for warned in my carry concealed weapons course that this is a serious issue with witnesses, they go for the 5 minutes of fame or comment on something they see immediately after shots are fired or they heard the events but actually didn’t see them as they occurred, puts innocent people in prison for years.
Bonnie Lee August 18th, 2014 at 14:45
I wish i could protest with these people. (peacefully) Something needs to be done about this gun crazed cop.
JeffreyPtr August 18th, 2014 at 18:52
If you are certain you already know all the facts then perhaps you should join the mob and maybe even lynch this “gun crazed cop”. Hand out whatever justice you feel is proper and we can all forget about such time consuming things like investigation and due process.
mcalleyboy August 18th, 2014 at 19:14
IAW the I-witnesses that said MB was shot in the back…autopsy shows he was shot in the front…hello!
mcalleyboy October 9th, 2014 at 21:19
Best way to protest is get both sides of the story, start by walking in a down town area, leave the life vest (human transport vehicle) in the garage take the public transportation. Another thing to think about is the stress law enforcement has to deal with, rude behavior, taunting, screaming at them (they’re humans, they bleed red blood) check out youtube video’s, violence on police, this includes women police officers, there’s a video that shows a female police officer get her face smashed in, she barely survived after several facial reconstruction surgeries. how far and how silly does it have to get before a police officer has the right to defend themselves, charging individuals should be taken out.
Bonnie Lee August 18th, 2014 at 14:45
I wish i could protest with these people. (peacefully) Something needs to be done about this gun crazed cop.
JeffreyPtr August 18th, 2014 at 18:52
If you are certain you already know all the facts then perhaps you should join the mob and maybe even lynch this “gun crazed cop”. Hand out whatever justice you feel is proper and we can all forget about such time consuming things like investigation and due process.
M.C.A. August 18th, 2014 at 19:14
IAW the I-witnesses that said MB was shot in the back…autopsy shows he was shot in the front…hello!
M.C.A. October 9th, 2014 at 21:19
Best way to protest is get both sides of the story, start by walking in a down town area, leave the life vest (human transport vehicle) in the garage take the public transportation. Another thing to think about is the stress law enforcement has to deal with, rude behavior, taunting, screaming at them (they’re humans, they bleed red blood) check out youtube video’s, violence on police, this includes women police officers, there’s a video that shows a female police officer get her face smashed in, she barely survived after several facial reconstruction surgeries. how far and how silly does it have to get before a police officer has the right to defend themselves, charging individuals should be taken out.
Ormond Otvos August 18th, 2014 at 18:34
Let the ill-informed conspiracy theories begin!
Ormond Otvos August 18th, 2014 at 18:34
Let the ill-informed conspiracy theories begin!
JamesMMartin August 18th, 2014 at 18:58
I suspect that the only bullet that will count, really, is the one to the brain, since one autopsy has concluded that none of the others, alone, could kill. We now await a report on the sequencing of th shots and was shooting him in the head really necessary. I don’t want to judge Wilson before that sort of question is answered.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 19:06
“One thing that bothers me is a report that Wilson’s father was killed by an African-American.” interesting.
JamesMMartin August 18th, 2014 at 18:58
I suspect that the only bullet that will count, really, is the one to the brain, since one autopsy has concluded that none of the others, alone, could kill. We now await a report on the likely sequencing of the shots and was shooting Brown in the head really necessary. I don’t want to judge Wilson before that sort of question is answered. One thing that bothers me is a report that Wilson’s father was killed by an African-American. But I will reserve my opinions until all the evidence is in — just like a good juror.
whatthe46 August 18th, 2014 at 19:06
“One thing that bothers me is a report that Wilson’s father was killed by an African-American.” interesting.
mcalleyboy August 18th, 2014 at 19:09
Ah, slowly the other side appears, I was warned in my carry concealed course about witnesses. MB appeared to have been shot in the back because of the way he was laying on the street, his pants seemed to be pulled down? Is this still a fad? I thought this was over with, origins I was told are from prison inmates…looking for other inmates but somehow it became a fad with the general public. Hey MB was not shot in the back it seems “I-witness accounts, discounted….again” and this guy stands 6 feet 4″ is that correct? Holy Cow…And IAW witness he taunted the police officer and then charged….ahhhh ah hugh, lets wait for more twists and turns but of course it’s still going to be a racial issue.
M.C.A. August 18th, 2014 at 19:09
Ah, slowly the other side appears, I was warned in my carry concealed course about witnesses. MB appeared to have been shot in the back because of the way he was laying on the street, his pants seemed to be pulled down? Is this still a fad? I thought this was over with, origins I was told are from prison inmates…looking for other inmates but somehow it became a fad with the general public. Hey MB was not shot in the back it seems “I-witness accounts, discounted….again” and this guy stands 6 feet 4″ is that correct? Holy Cow…And IAW witness he taunted the police officer and then charged….ahhhh ah hugh, lets wait for more twists and turns but of course it’s still going to be a racial issue.