Why the government lost its case against the Oregon occupiers
What happened at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge earlier this year was no whodunit. Many of the men and women in the 41-day protest in rural Oregon were filmed and photographed taking over and occupying the facility. Some were even captured there. Some had guns. At trial in federal court in Portland — where seven defendants…
5 responses to Why the government lost its case against the Oregon occupiers
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
granpa.usthai October 29th, 2016 at 10:01
so much for ‘justice’ in the ‘courts’.
radical white ‘christian’ terrorist can do no wrong, it’s a given.
people must defend themselves from them – by whatever means are necessary.
oldfart October 29th, 2016 at 11:48
“The U.S. attorney’s office in Oregon did not respond to interview requests Friday.”
He’s busy digging a hole to drop himself and the ball into it.
wpadon October 29th, 2016 at 11:55
This District Attorney should expect a pink slip January 20th regardless of the election outcome.
cat007 October 29th, 2016 at 12:57
This jury was probably a bunch of gun nuts that hate the government. I hope they didn’t have families because they just screwed their kids.
DudefromTulsa October 29th, 2016 at 20:31
Western jurisprudence is built on the belief that 12 citizens, wise and true, should be the final arbiters of guilt or innocence. We are about to discover what happens when that sacred duty is entrusted to cowards and imbeciles.