Pratt: Gun owners will stop Hillary from tyranny

Posted by | June 9, 2016 22:00 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics


Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America believes only because we can have guns will Hillary Clinton not be a tyrant.

[Pratt]… added Hillary Clinton this week to the list of public officials who he has warned will face violence from gun owners if they impose regulations on guns…

What she’s telling me is that she may understand the meaning of the Second Amendment, which is even scarier, because the Second Amendment is meant to tell people like her that might be thinking about going off in a tyrannical direction: ‘Don’t even think about it.’ Because the Second Amendment has recognized the right people have to possess the kind of firearms that your protectors have, Mrs. Clinton, and if you even think, if you even try to go off in a tyrannical direction, the Constitution protects the people’s right to protect the people themselves against people like you.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

14 responses to Pratt: Gun owners will stop Hillary from tyranny

  1. arc99 June 9th, 2016 at 22:18

    Mr. Pratt, that same Constitution also protects the 2nd amendment rights of people like me who detest everything you stand for. So go ahead. Make my day. Try to use violence to erase the results of a lawful election.

    Of all of the ignorant misconceptions infesting the right wing, the one I find most amusing is their notion that liberals and leftists do not own firearms. Yes we do Mr. Pratt and in a worst case scenario, it is far more likely that my firearm will be pointed at people like you, not President H. Clinton.

  2. Mensa Member June 9th, 2016 at 23:09

    Republicans are already transferring their moronic dire predictions from Obama to Hillary.

  3. Larry Schmitt June 9th, 2016 at 23:59

    They keep trying to say that a candidate with armed Secret Service protection is hypocritical by supporting sensible gun legislation. As if any candidate or president has a choice to not have an armed guard at all times. The gun lobby is single-minded, the same way PETA is, and no other issue even exists.

    • fahvel June 10th, 2016 at 03:07

      hey, the people created an royal class called politicians. Rather than pols being servants of the people, they have become nobility and just their existence is rather costly. Never mind that the word politician is a synonymy with dishonest, narcissistic etc. They few who a real and kind and caring get dumped.

  4. Buford2k11 June 10th, 2016 at 01:01

    I think this guy is certifiable…and needs a “check up”…from the FBI or ya know a Proctologist or two…

    • fahvel June 10th, 2016 at 03:05

      I know a proct who use #8 rebar!!!!

  5. fahvel June 10th, 2016 at 03:04

    aside from him being totally insane, he has a practical point -tyranny should not be tolerated.

  6. bpollen June 10th, 2016 at 03:45

    Yeah, she has all 4 branches of the military at her disposal, but they will all quail at the site of Cletus and Festus and Billy Ray Bob waving their varmint guns.

    • MyDogsAreSmarterThanYou June 10th, 2016 at 08:04

      Like Obama said, “I have drones.”

  7. Budda June 10th, 2016 at 06:34

    The guy seems to have a talent to express peoples most stupid , ignorant prejudices and wishes as if they made sense. He needs a visit from some FBI types to explain reality to him.

  8. MyDogsAreSmarterThanYou June 10th, 2016 at 08:02

    Umm, no. The 2nd Amendment is to maintain the security of a free state. It does not exist to maintain the free state itself. Because militias, and the founders did not want a standing army.
    I would personally be a-okay with letting people maintain their own weapons. But if you’re going to do so, I should have reasonable assurances that you know what the hell you’re doing.

  9. mea_mark June 10th, 2016 at 08:08

    Prattle on … it is what you were created to do.

  10. spacegod June 10th, 2016 at 20:15

    Larry comes up short in just about everything.
    Plus, he’s not very tall.

    Compensate much?
    I wouldn’t be surprised if he drove a red Tesla.

Leave a Reply