George Zimmerman Compares Obama To ‘Mixed Race’ Oregon Shooter
If you want to know what the bottom of a barrel looks like, read George Zimmerman’s Twitter feed.
On Twitter, where Zimmerman does his attacking these days, the acquitted killer tweeted: “2 things P.O.S. Obama & his son have in common, self proclaimed “mixed race” and attacking Christians on US soil.” Zimmerman included a picture of suspected Oregon shooter Christopher Harper Mercer, who identifies as mixed race.
Zimmerman based his claim upon Mercer killing Christians on an apocryphal story told to a woman by her grandmother who claimed to be on the scene and said Mercer asked students their religion before shooting them. Earlier reports only stated that he asked their religion, but said nothing about Christianity being mentioned.
Zimmerman’s reference to Obama’s son was based upon a comment the president made saying Trayvon Martin could have been his himself “35 years ago” or his son.
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
42 responses to George Zimmerman Compares Obama To ‘Mixed Race’ Oregon Shooter
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
pinballsdoll October 3rd, 2015 at 08:32
that picture makes me want to puke
Annette Hamm October 3rd, 2015 at 08:33
last tuesday I got a top of the range Honda from earning $16020 this last four weeks and also ten-k last-month . this is definitely the coolest work I have ever done . Without any question it’s the most financially rewarding Ive had . I started this 4 months ago & practicaIIy straight away began to bring home over $97 p/h .Visit weblink to start immediately.
…ns.
➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleExtraPayingTopJobsTickEmploymentProjects/Get/Start/Today… ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱
The Original Just Me October 3rd, 2015 at 08:55
I’ll hold your head and hair for you. I understand.
Jeanette Pickett October 4th, 2015 at 04:44
Last tuesday I got a top of the McLaren F1 from earning $16020 this last four weeks and also 15-k last-month . this is definitely the coolest work I have ever done . Without any question it’s the most financially rewarding Ive had . I started this 4 months ago & practicaIIy straight away began to bring home over $97 p/h .Visit weblink to start immediately.
..pkh……
➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleSuperPayingTopJobsSysEmploymentProjects/Get/Start/Today… ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱
Google Online::Get $97/hourly October 4th, 2015 at 05:54
Last tuesday I got a top of the McLaren F1 from earning $16020 this last four weeks and also 15-k last-month . this is definitely the coolest work I have ever done . Without any question it’s the most financially rewarding Ive had . I started this 4 months ago & practicaIIy straight away began to bring home over $97 p/h .Visit weblink to start immediately.
..bd……….
➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleSuperPayingTopJobsSetEmploymentProjects/Get/Start/Today… ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 07:27
Good to see George looking so well isn’t it. After what the press, Obama, Holder, ‘New’ Black Panthers, Sharpton, Crump, Corey, de la Rionda all pulled- good for him.
Strange that notions such as due process and Brady disclosure are blatently disregarded when a picture of a 12 year old is used to manipulate the feeble minded.
OldLefty October 7th, 2015 at 07:32
That’s funny.
Are you doing schtick?
It’s getting harder and harder to tell what is real and what is from The Onion.
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 07:37
You aren’t a fan of due process and what it entails, then? How about affirmative action and its effects in Martin’s continued behaviour?
OldLefty October 7th, 2015 at 08:01
That’s the problem.
We know there was not actual “due process” and the the prosecutors threw the case.
Zimmerman got “due process” like OJ got “due process”
There was nothing wrong with Trayvon Martin’s behavior, and anyone who doubts that it was George Zimmerman who was the thug knows better now, after observing HIS behavior.
The Times-Picayune’s DeBerry said his ex-prosecutor source “said he’s polled about 20 prosecutors in New Orleans, and though all aren’t sure that they would have been able to get
Zimmerman convicted as charged, each of them is convinced that he or she could have gotten more than an acquittal. It was a clear case of tanking, he argued: ‘They didn’t want to win this case.’
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 08:31
The rot started with Obama and his ‘my son’ bullchit in the Rose Garden and spread down. To comment on a case when there wasn’t even a charge made at that point was reprehensible, and let’s face it- Obama has since had a track record of similar interventions. He tried it with the ‘Gentle Giant’ bull with Mike Brown but it was too soon after the Zimmerman case to gain traction.
The press ran with a picture of a 12 year old- this was the same photo. that the Black Panthers used on their ‘dead or alive’ posters. Due process? de la Rionda took Martin’s cell phone out of evidence and left it unobserved with Martin’s parents and their lawyer Crump. You DID hear about the deleted information including child porn, texts between father and son about his getting Trayvon a gun, drug abuse etc.? Due process… Corey, sacking an IT guy for whistle-blowing the fact that the prosecution didn’t hand over key evidence to the defense- due process…
This was only the second murder trial de la Rionda had lost. ‘We’ know nothing of the sort about a thrown case. Given the above you actually type that with a straight face??? The prosecution and the system went full-on to prosecute and convict Zimmerman- whereas Corey knew she wouldn’t even get it past a Grand Jury!!
Martin’s behaviour followed a pattern- he was a violent bullying thug. It was affirmative action at his school that prevented any meaningful action being taken to curb these characteristics. Did you read his tweet about how he’d punched someone to the ground with a broken nose and how they ‘wouldn’t get away so lightly’ next time? Sound familiar? Contrast that to an extended assault that saw Zimmerman underneath him shouting for help, and a neighbour telling him to quit it. It’s surprising that Zimmerman held out for so long. If it had been a cop he’d have been shot straight off.
Zimmerman’s behaviour? Two speeding tickets. But perhaps if it had been YOUR wife’s jewellry and wedding bands that Martin stole or it was your underage daughter he had pictures of on his phone…
OldLefty October 7th, 2015 at 08:55
The rot started with racism in Florida.
The police mishandled evidence right from the beginning and allowed Zimmerman to roam free and produce exculpatory evidence while crime scene evidence was deteriorating.
The lead detective Chris Serino told Zimmerman the screams for help were his, not Martin’s, over Zimmerman’s objection.
The Times-Picayune’s DeBerry said his ex-prosecutor source “said he’s polled about 20 prosecutors in New
Orleans, and though all aren’t sure that they would have been able to get Zimmerman convicted as charged, each of them is convinced that he or she could
have gotten more than an acquittal. It was a clear case of tanking, he argued: ‘They didn’t want to win this case.’”
No change of venue was ever asked for.
Prosecutors that incrementally lowered their chances of obtaining a conviction by not seeking a jury trial in another county. The Seminole County district attorney and multiple judges recused themselves, “proof that the case was political poison and that there was a fear that there would be negative political ramifications following a Zimmerman verdict, but the state did not want to move the trial.
Juror B-37… should never have been let onto the jury after she said there were ‘riots’ in Sanford over this case,” She called Martin a “boy of color” She even mentioned “rioting” twice , calling it “organized” by Martin supporters and adding that she didn’t trust mainstream media. Then she signed a contract with a literary agent immediately after the trial ended.
The defense witness that impressed B-37 the most was that friend of Zimmerman’s (whom she mistook for a doctor) who testified he knew it was Zimmerman’s voice based on a knack acquired in military service, He had been sitting in the courtroom throughout the trial before his testimony—undisguised and adjacent to the defense team—in flagrant violation of the witness sequestration rule. He should never have been permitted to testify.
The prosecutors allowed Zimmerman to testify in his own defense by admitting into evidence his Sean
Hannity interview on Fox News for the ostensible reason of admitting a minor detail.
The jury did not get proper instructions.
And it has nothing to do with the Black Panthers, (ALL three of them) or photos.)
Sorry, but George Zimmerman is the white ammosexual racist’s very own OJ.Simpson.
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 09:43
More generalisations. I’d appreciate what evidence was mishandled. To my knowledge, Martin’s hands weren’t ‘bagged-‘ that’s all. What did Zimmerman do to the crime scene?
I’ve never, ever, heard the story of Serino saying that. What I do know is that Martin’s father said it wasn’t his son screaming but, following a meeting with Crump, denied ever having said it. Unfortunately for them both there was a second police officer present.
Your evidence of a thrown trial (overlooking the fact that Corey refused to convene a Grand Jury-why?)- is that no change of venue was requested??? That a juror, in your opinion, shouldn’t have been selected? How about juror B-29: ‘I wanted to find Zimmerman guilty but there wasn’t the evidence.’ Lol! Just let that sentence sink in for a moment in all of it’s ramifications, not only in its implication of bias but also it’s stupidity… and STILL it’s a unanimous verdict.
Judge Nelson didn’t instruct the jury properly? How so? More generalisations.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/zimmerman1/Zimjuryinstructions.pdf
The press saturation of a picture of a 12 year old had nothing to do with the case?? That picture is STILL making the rounds now. It’s impact was entirely detrimental to Zimmerman’s case and entirely on purpose. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge the fact does you no favours- or do you think that your supposed two wrongs making a right applies here as well?
Finally, you play the race card which was the point from the off. Ever heard of a ‘white Hispanic’ before Zimmerman? I do note your hypocrisy in raising race but not Martin’s own racism in attacking Zimmerman. But hey- racist, bigot, ‘ammosexual,’ it’s all good ad hom.
OldLefty October 7th, 2015 at 10:21
The police took Zimmerman’s word and claimed there was no evidence to contradict his claims and allowed him to do whatever. Imagine leaving a suspect free to get stories strait or manipulate physical evidence on their person?
They did very little door-to-door canvassing
The police took only one photo at the scene of any of Mr. Zimmerman’s injuries — a full-face picture of him that showed a bloodied nose — before paramedics tended to him. It was shot on a department cellphone camera and was not downloaded for a few days, an oversight by the officer who took it.
The vehicle that Zimmerman was driving when he first spotted Mr. Martin was mistakenly not secured by officers as part of the crime scene.
The police were not able to cover the crime scene to shield evidence from the rain, and any blood from cuts that Zimmerman suffered when he said Martin pounded his head into a sidewalk may have been washed away.
The police did not test Mr. Zimmerman for alcohol or drug use that night, and one witness said the lead investigator quickly jumped to a conclusion that it was Mr. Zimmerman, and not Mr. Martin, who cried for help during the struggle.
Some Sanford officers were skeptical from the beginning about certain details of Mr. Zimmerman’s account. For instance, he told the police that Mr. Martin had punched him over and over again, but they questioned whether his injuries were consistent with the number of blows he claimed he received. They also suspected that some of the threatening and dramatic language that Mr. Zimmerman said Mr. Martin uttered during the struggle — like “You are going to die tonight” — sounded contrived.
Judge Debra Nelson did not give an initial aggressor jury instruction, basically leaving it up to the jury to decide whether these facts matter, how much, and in what way. Her decision to not instruct the jury to consider this part of the law went well beyond the boundaries of judicial discretion in forming a jury instruction, or even discretion in interpreting the Stand Your Ground statute. In fact, it may have contaminated the verdict by obscuring a crucial piece of the law.
http://www.law.columbia.edu/magazine/611849
Spare me the “race card ” hooey.
And press coverage has nothing to do with the judicial process.
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 10:57
I’m still waiting on this ‘exculpatory evidence’ you allege Zimmerman pulled out of his hat.
The cell ‘phone picture of his facial injury wasn’t forthcoming until just before the trial started- months, not weeks, after the event. Your point?
Door-to-door canvassing WAS done by Sanford PD and again by Holder’s FBI. What were you expecting to be uncovered?
Zimmerman showed no signs of impairment. Why should he be drug/alchohol tested?
Zimmerman was arrested and taken to the police station. A source there released video of him showing no apparent injuries. This ‘source’ is suspected to be the police sergeant who is a friend of Tracy Martin and one of three officers who pressurised Serino to arrest Zimmerman. He wasn’t ‘left’ to get any story ‘straight’ nor did he injure himself- stop making things up. His injuries were catalogued at the scene by a paramedic and fire rescue and then again by his PA the next day.
‘One witness?’ ‘Lead investigator?’ Who??????
Chris Serino is on record stating that he had doubts about Zimmerman’s account and he’d interveiw him again to ‘try and catch him out.’ He failed. There wasn’t any evidence- period. Then, enter Ryan Julison, Benjamin Crump and Natalie Jackson to sell the ‘racist’ angle that back-fired as far as the majority of people are concerned. White Hispanic indeed.
Why should Nelson interpret Stand Your Ground for the jury? That was never invoked.
Race card hooey? You felt the need to bring it up, not I. But as you did, what is hooey? The race baiters from Obama down or Martin’s own comments before he attacked Zimmerman? Why ‘ammosexual’ for anyone who doesn’t buy into the narrative presented? You’re totally transparent.
The press coverage was fundamental is tainting any jury pool- that’s the point that you’re willfully ignorant of. I’m assuming you’re an American citizen- I’d like to hear what you have to say if a mechanism like that was brought to bear on YOU.
Don’t think I haven’t noticed your ignoring the vast majority of facts presented. Eventually you’ll have nothing left to whittle down.
OldLefty October 7th, 2015 at 13:31
The burdan is not on me. The police did not maintain the chain of evidence.
There is a reason why, when taking exams, people are not allowed to leave for a couple of hours and come back.
Can you PROVE that they were cheating?
No, but you just don’t give them the opportunity.
We don’t know what happened to the cell phone photo that the police forgot to download as evidence.
Frankly, I’ve given you a lot of specifics.
An unarmed kid was shot and killed by an armed person who was told to back off.
Drug testing is standard procedure in most homicide investigations.
Serino filed an affidavit on Feb. 26, the night that Martin was shot and killed by Zimmerman, that stated he was unconvinced Zimmerman’s version of events. He said ” was instructed to not press charges against Zimmerman because the state attorney’s office headed by Norman Wolfinger determined there wasn’t enough evidence to lead to a conviction, the sources told ABC News..
As for the judge, the point was that her failure to instruct the jury on initial aggressor could not EVEN be explained by discretion in interpreting the Stand Your Ground statute, and may in fact have contaminated the verdict by obscuring a crucial piece of the law.
And Zimmerman had more than traffic tickets in his past;
In July 2005, he was arrested for “resisting officer with violence.” The
neighborhood watch volunteer who wanted to be a cop got into a scuffle with
cops who were questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking. The charges
were reduced and then waived after he entered an alcohol education program.
Then in August 2005, Zimmerman’s former fiance sought a restraining order
against him because of domestic violence. Zimmerman sought a restraining order
against her in return. Both were granted. Meanwhile, over the course of eight
years, Zimmerman made at least 46 calls to the Sanford (Fla.) Police Department
reporting suspicious activity involving black males.
Race card hooey? You felt the need to bring it up, not I.
______
You brought it up. (I simply quoted a juror)
The race baiters were on Fox News.
“Ammosexual”??
Seriously???
If it had been Trayvon who had the gun (assuming he was old enough), the Fox News crowd would have been calling Zimmerman the thug who attacked Trayvon.
But here you had the trifecta; You got to defend guns, thugify victim, and poke the black community.
But as you did, what is hooey? The race baiters from Obama down or Martin’s own comments before he attacked Zimmerman? Why ‘ammosexual’ for anyone who doesn’t buy into the narrative presented? You’re totally transparent.
Meanwhile if you look at the evidence, if anybody was defending himself, it was Trayvon Martin.
(Don’t forget; Valerie Rao, the Jacksonville, Fla., medical
examiner for Duval, Clay and Nassau counties,
said that Zimmerman Injuries, were “very insignificant”.
sloop October 8th, 2015 at 05:40
You made the claim of ‘exculpatory evidence’ not me- the onus is on you to put up or shut up.
Every specific you’ve given has been shot down in flames.
Zimmerman was on his way back to his vechile when confronted by Martin. Chad Joseph gave evidence to the fact that he heard Martin come back into the house and then leave again. He purposely returned to confront Zimmerman. You need to clear your head of the cutesy 12 yeard old and see Martin for what he was- a violent drug-abusing NO_LIMIT_NIGGA thug. He picked on the wrong cracka and paid the price. Punching someone to the ground and then assaulting them for nearly a minute, all the while Zimmerman screaming for help and Martin ignoring a concerned neighbour to get off of him? Hardly likely- he was having far too much fun. And that’s SELF DEFENSE???
Zimmerman’s injuries: a “closed fracture” of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head caused by blunt force trauma and a minor back injury. Oops, silly me- no doubt he inflcited these himself while no-one was looking. As for ‘very insignifcant’ injuries they read like a shopping list to me- or maybe you think DIY rhinoplasty by Martin improved Zimmerman’s looks?
http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2013/06/28/Zimmermannose.png
Oh, the howls of protest when that photograph finally came out, the talk of photoshop manipulation, police collusion…
But here you had the trifecta; YOU (my emphasis) got to defend guns, thugify victim, and poke the black community.
Lol! Ad hominem much? Martin- an habitual drug user, thief, vandal, violent bully, racist. What qualifies as ‘thug’ where you come from? As a Brit. I’ve no cause to ‘defend guns.’ ‘Black community?’ The case was, and is, about one troubled youth. Your earnest wish to the contrary doesn’t make it so. So. Care to try some peronal attacks, ‘trifecta’ or otherwise?
”Meanwhile if you look at the evidence, if anybody was defending himself, it was Trayvon Martin.”
You should have told that to Angela Corey when she chickened out out of presenting her evidence before a Grand Jury. I’ll ask the question again- why? What did she know that you’re still pretending not to?
OldLefty October 8th, 2015 at 08:27
Spare me all this. We ALL know this.
My point (and the point of many attorneys who believe that the case was deliberately “thrown”) about exculpatory evidence is that you don’t allow the opportunity to come up in a serious legit investigation.
Rick Scott chose Angela Corey who is known for overcharging. As for the IT guy; Judge Nelson has already ruled that the evidence is not relevant or admissible and it certainly is not exculpatory.
Meanwhile, Volusia and Seminole County associate medical examiner Shiping Bao says he was never given the opportunity to share his full conclusions about Martin’s death with the jury in the Zimmerman case, because prosecutors didn’t ask basic questions of him when he was on the stand, including whether he believed it was possible for Trayvon Martin to have been on top of Zimmerman at the time he was shot.
“The state attorney just clearly disregarded a number of points he wanted to make that could have made the
difference [in the outcome of the trial] and he feels strongly about that,” “After his testimony initially, when the defense took the position that Trayvon Martin was on top of [Zimmerman], he asked the question about rebuttal and told [prosecutors] that’s not true. He told them, ‘I can absolutely prove that.’” But Gary said prosecutors declined to attempt a rebuttal of the defense team’s cross-examination of Bao.
Bao says he believes based on his experience and autopsies he has performed in similar cases, that Martin might have lived for “one to ten minutes” after he was shot and that he would have been in pain. But Gary says that when Bao tried to raise these points with the prosecution team, “the attitude was, ‘why are you doing this? Are you working for Trayvon?’ (ACTUALLY they are supposed to be acting as the attorneys for Trayvon since he can not speak for himself) He said, ‘I’m not working for Trayvon Martin, I’m just trying to get to the truth.’ But their attitude was that you are working for Trayvon.”
Bao is not the first to question the actions of the Duval County prosecutors who have been widely panned for their performance in the Zimmerman trial, or even the first to question whether they threw the case. But he is the first person directly connected with the case to do so.
Even Fox News Channel. Judge Andrew Napolitano complained that the government made “a conscious choice to demonize the defendant.”
Zimmerman in one of his police interviews placed himself upon Trayvon’s body after he fired the fatal shot—from a hollow-point bullet—into the heart of Trayvon when he said he “grabbed his hands when I was on top of him and spread his hands away from his body…and I was on top of him.”
Remember, Zimmerman said he was in fear for his life because Trayvon was brutally beating him. So, why would he do this—especially, when he claimed he thought Trayvon wasn’t seriously injured?Prosecutors did highlight that police found Trayvon hands, contrary to Zimmerman’s claim, underneath his body and not “spread” “away from his body.”
“We could see no physical signs like there had been a scuffle [or] there had been a fight,” said Mr. Richard Kurtz, funeral director of the Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home. “The hands — I didn’t see any knuckles, bruises or what have you.” Why weren’t Mr. Kurtz’s findings used forcefully to back-up the autopsy report done by Dr. Shiping Bao, which found only two small abrasions on Trayvon’s left hand?
“We could see no physical signs like there had been a scuffle [or] there had been a fight,” said Mr. Richard Kurtz, funeral director of the Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home. “The hands — I didn’t see any knuckles, bruises or what have you.” Why weren’t Mr. Kurtz’s findings used forcefully to back-up the autopsy report done by Dr. Shiping Bao, which found only two small abrasions on Trayvon’s left hand.
And, Zimmerman’s account was fishy from a timeline standpoint, Serino and Singleton knew it (or at least suspected), and they got answers from Zimmerman that prove his story was bogus. All they needed to do was use the occasion of Serino’s testimony to point that out: replay that part of the NEN call, replay the part of the interview quoted above, get out a map with distances marked, connect the dots.
So it seems to me that what we have here is either incompetence that stretches credulity, or a conscious decision to exclude incriminating evidence, which is even more troubling.
I am painting and wallpapering right now and my posting will be sparse, but I want to be clear on this;
We have gone back and forth with evidence that does not move the other side.
I believe that the prosecutors chose to “take a dive” on this case by overcharging and deliberately putting up a weak and lackluster case.
I think they did it as a means to essentially say; “Here’s your sham trail, now shut up”.
I think this was evident from the moment the police let Trayvon lie in the morgue for 3 days as a John Doe after his mom reported him missing, from the way the police botched the case from the beginning from the way they only pressed charges (should have been manslaughter) after there was a public outcry.
I think that by Florida’s stand your ground law (Stand Your Ground ACTUALLY DID play a major role; Zimmerman remained a free for 6 weeks
after the killing. Bill Lee Jr., then Sanford’s police chief, told the Times: “We were basing our decisions, which were made in concert with the state
attorney’s office, on the findings of the investigation at the time, and we were abiding by the Florida law that covers self-defense.”)
And…..Instructions to the jury; “If George Zimmerman was not engaged in an unlawful activity and was attacked in any place where he had a right to be, he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/Zimmerman_Final_Jury_Instructions.pdf
So, to repeat; I think that by Florida’s stand your ground law, and given the instructions given to the jury, if Trayvon had been old enough to have legally had a gun, and it was HE who had killed George, Trayvon would have gotten off with a stand your ground defense.
I also think (from Zimmermen’s past and present), that what happened was that Zimmerman was a police wannbe, prone to violence who
thought that a gun would make him a big man (and as his friend, Frank Taaffe said, “I think he had fed-up issues. He was mad as hell and wasn’t going to take it anymore,”) who got a kick out of picking on this kid who got scared and fought back, and got away with manslaughter.
whatthe46 October 7th, 2015 at 09:48
you have serious issues. meds just be the key. won’t cure your stupidity, but it just might help with your delusions.
The Original Just Me October 3rd, 2015 at 08:54
What ! hasn’t Sarah or Bristol said anything totally stupid lately ? Is that why this FAT Pile of Dog Crap is getting his Ugly face in the news lately. Who gives a Arial, Seducing, Circulating, Pastry about him ?
Leroy Goldberg October 3rd, 2015 at 11:30
That’s a money shot right there!
Larry Schmitt October 3rd, 2015 at 12:00
I have an idea. Let’s not publicize anything this bag of crap says anymore. Why does he continue to get a soapbox? He has nothing to say.
StoneyCurtisll October 3rd, 2015 at 20:33
I totally agree..
tracey marie October 3rd, 2015 at 14:12
Thug is reduced to renting a home with other people to be able to afford rent, selling confederate flag pins and paintings to survive. His cash flow is low due to the decline in sales so he is drumming up business by posting racist and childish tweets….
alpacadaddy October 3rd, 2015 at 20:32
… but are you talking about Zimmerbigot or the GOTP in general?
His activities post-acquittal betray his justification for murder… what a prick!
tracey marie October 3rd, 2015 at 21:38
zimm in particular, the goptb in general
dewired4u October 3rd, 2015 at 16:57
he will get his and when he does I will do the happy dance……..
Obewon October 3rd, 2015 at 18:18
‘Mixed Race’ Xenophobe George Zimmerman polls lower than dog crap.
jybarz October 3rd, 2015 at 19:50
Here’s one guy who truly deserves to be shot.
StoneyCurtisll October 3rd, 2015 at 20:39
We all know this child killer is constantly looking over his shoulder, wondering where the next shot is coming from..
Let him have his short time of braggadocio..
He who lives by the gun, dies by the gun.
It’s just a matter of time.
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 07:20
And he who lives by the thug- dies by the thug. Having said that, if YOU fancy your chances as ‘lil ‘ol Trayvon did- go for it.
Hirightnow October 7th, 2015 at 07:41
OOH! Look, everyone; an internet thug who showed up to post braggadocio THREE FUCKING DAYS after the original comment.
You know, l’esprit d’escalier should at least be funny…or effective.
sloop October 7th, 2015 at 07:49
Stop borrowing words from the OP that you don’t understand. As for when I respond is there a sell-by date I need to be aware of? And if so then what are YOU doing here? You’re funny alright- just not intentionally so.
Now- open up your posting history so we can see what you’re really about, troll.
Hirightnow October 7th, 2015 at 13:44
As to why I am here, most threads here receive their comments for about a day,then go quiet. The main page and article pages have a section called “Our Readers Say…”, which shows the latest comments to any particular thread.
As for opening my comment history, I’ve had trouble in the past with several brave, responsibility-taking, oh-so-intelligent-and-mature RW loons following me thread to thread and making all sorts of nasty comments and threats, so no, that aint gonna happen.
As for being a troll? Well, you’re entitled to your opinion, of which I’m certain you’ve heard the saying about how everyone has one, but anyone who refers to the President as “Soetoro” and hangs out at Breitbart’s, well…their opinion means little to me.
And just because you had to look up a word doesn’t mean the rest of us had to.
whatthe46 October 7th, 2015 at 14:04
you tell him sweetie. and whenever anyone makes that statement to me about opening up my comment history, that’s the same reason i don’t. i call ’em fk’n stalkers. no thank you.
Hirightnow October 7th, 2015 at 18:17
If’n youins were ta notice, I were careful ta use my inside aspeakin’ tones with him…
whatthe46 October 7th, 2015 at 19:33
cracking up.
Hirightnow October 7th, 2015 at 20:48
Right kindly of ye ta say so.
sloop October 8th, 2015 at 05:09
So there’s no mythical sell-by date I should be aware of… talk about hoisted by your petard.
Hidden posting history goes against the concept of an open forum. Your paranoia is no concern of mine, only the end result- an anonymous troll. Time to get back under your bridge.
Hirightnow October 8th, 2015 at 16:02
You’re babbling, you know.
But if you don’t like what I say, gripe to the mods…I’m sure that they’ll be more than happy to assist you.
whatthe46 October 7th, 2015 at 14:05
why do you want him to open his history? so you can follow and harrass?
sloop October 8th, 2015 at 05:12
Another anonymous troll. Enjoy your little clicky circle with Hi. Is there anyone else in your mutual admiration society?
tracey marie October 7th, 2015 at 18:35
babble and bagger bragodoccia, both are meaningless