Anti-choice group says Trump promised to support its personhood legislation

Posted by | December 7, 2016 14:01 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics

National Pro-Life Alliance says Trump vowed to support their agenda, which is to ban all abortions, period.

During his presidential campaign, Trump took a dizzying variety of often conflicting positions on abortion rights, but generally landed on saying that he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, handing abortion rights decisions back to the states, and saying that he himself is “pro-life with exceptions.” Trump’s nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services, Rep. Tom Price of Georgia, has sponsored “personhood” legislation in Congress.

The National Pro-Life Alliance (NPLA) has been working primarily with Sen. Rand Paul to promote the “Life at Conception Act,” which would attempt to dismantle Roe v. Wade by declaring that the Constitution’s protections apply beginning from “the moment of fertilization.” Advocates of this “personhood” strategy believe that there is a magic loophole in Roe v. Wade that would allow Congress to bypass the decision and outlaw abortion simply by declaring embryos and fetuses to be legal persons—an argument that is disputed even by many anti-choice attorneys.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

3 responses to Anti-choice group says Trump promised to support its personhood legislation

  1. oldfart December 7th, 2016 at 14:03

    tRump promised
    tRump lied
    Poor babies.

  2. Budda December 7th, 2016 at 15:00

    Are these “Pro-Life” folks going to up their effort to make birth control more available? Sex education more relevant? If not, they can just stfu.

  3. nola878 December 7th, 2016 at 15:43

    Pass person hood. II dare you. I double dare you.

    The consequences will be amusing to watch.

    A pregnant women has a cocktail. Contributing to the delinquency of a minor?

    She has a miscarriage. Manslaughter?

    Gets on an elevator marked capacity 10 persons. Reckless endangerment?

    Am I being silly? Nope. Just calling for strict enforcement of a law.

Leave a Reply