Boehner Describes Obama Budget As ‘Good Laugh’

Posted by | February 3, 2015 21:00 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Top Stories


Showing the utmost respect for the commander-in-chief, John Boehner is laughing at the president‘s budget proposal.

[He] said the president’s budget proposal released Monday provided the American people with a “good laugh”.

Boehner criticized President Obama’s plan that he said calls for higher taxes, more spending and a larger government in Washington. He added the budget is full of “the same old policies that have failed for the last six years.”

Liberaland awaits your “like” on Facebook 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

40 responses to Boehner Describes Obama Budget As ‘Good Laugh’

  1. Carla Akins February 3rd, 2015 at 21:20

    Exactly what I thought of the House’s vote to repeal.

    • Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 01:09

      SIXTY MOTHER F***IN SEVEN!!!

      • Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 01:13

        You’re right though.
        It is a laugh.

        Republican plan:
        – Kick 10 million people off of health insurance
        – THEN figure out a plan to replace Obamacare
        – Implement plan
        – Months? Years? later, maybe have something that works anywhere near as well as the ACA and finally gets these people insured again.

        Bonus step:
        – Don’t mention any deaths due to repeal

  2. Carla Akins February 3rd, 2015 at 22:20

    Exactly what I thought of the House’s vote to repeal.

    • Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 02:09

      SIXTY MOTHER F***IN SEVEN!!!

      • Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 02:13

        You’re right though.
        It is a laugh.

        Republican plan:
        – Kick 10 million people off of health insurance
        – THEN figure out a plan to replace Obamacare
        – Implement plan
        – Months? Years? later, maybe have something that works anywhere near as well as the ACA and finally gets these people insured again.

        Bonus step:
        – Don’t mention any deaths due to repeal

  3. KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker February 3rd, 2015 at 21:26

    Sorry John, it’s republican policies that have failed decade after decade.

    • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 00:53

      RULE NUMBER ONE when addressing a Republican:

      Never, never, never ever use FACTS!

      even if some of them can guess letters at a .00005% correct level.

  4. KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker February 3rd, 2015 at 22:26

    Sorry John, it’s republican policies that have failed decade after decade.

    • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 01:53

      RULE NUMBER ONE when addressing a Republican:

      Never, never, never ever use FACTS!

      even if some of them can guess letters at a .00005% correct level.

  5. neworleans878 February 3rd, 2015 at 21:36

    If a Republican ever gets back in the White House, respect for the POTUS will become mandatory like it was under Baby Bush.

    • whatthe46 February 4th, 2015 at 00:27

      and we’ll be back in the sh’t hole again. and at war with somebody.

      • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 00:49

        some/many/most who survive will be working in the rice fields of China while some of my in-laws take a well deserved break.

    • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 00:47

      – it’ll be by a racketeering scam for sure.
      (maybe another SCOTUS coin flip on a double elephant coin?).

  6. nola878 February 3rd, 2015 at 22:36

    If a Republican ever gets back in the White House, respect for the POTUS will become mandatory like it was under Baby Bush.

    • whatthe46 February 4th, 2015 at 01:27

      and we’ll be back in the sh’t hole again. and at war with somebody.

      • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 01:49

        some/many/most who survive will be working in the rice fields of China while some of my in-laws take a well deserved break.

    • granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 01:47

      – it’ll be by a racketeering scam for sure.
      (maybe another SCOTUS coin flip on a double elephant coin?).

  7. granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 00:44

    oh goodie, lower taxes (for the rich)
    and smaller government (with more political positions)

    and we give all the nations wealth to the rich (cause they know how to accept government give away monies and put in their offshore bank accounts)

    and the profits that are generated from sitting in an offshore bank account of the rich (?) will come pouring down the social ladder in a trickle that will puddle at the bottom and rise upwards lifting all ships (100ft. and over)

    and the economic boom will be heard all across America as more and more homeless begin walking the streets again (just like under POTUS Reagan and his VOODOO ECONOMICS.)

    one thing about the ‘New Republican Party’ – they’re chock full of the standard SOS mime.

  8. granpa.usthai February 4th, 2015 at 01:44

    oh goodie, lower taxes (for the rich)
    and smaller government (with more political positions)

    and we give all the nations wealth to the rich (cause they know how to accept government give away monies and put in their offshore bank accounts)

    and the profits that are generated from sitting in an offshore bank account of the rich (?) will come pouring down the social ladder in a trickle that will puddle at the bottom and rise upwards lifting all ships (100ft. and over)

    and the economic boom will be heard all across America as more and more homeless begin walking the streets again (just like under POTUS Reagan and his VOODOO ECONOMICS.)

    one thing about the ‘New Republican Party’ – they’re chock full of the standard SOS mime.

  9. fahvel February 4th, 2015 at 01:14

    to reduce the size of government I believe all boners should be disallowed – no hardons in congress!!!

  10. fahvel February 4th, 2015 at 02:14

    to reduce the size of government I believe all boners should be disallowed – no hardons in congress!!!

  11. rg9rts February 4th, 2015 at 01:59

    Hey Boner….want a good laugh?? Look at the record of accomplishments by congress since you became speaker. 0

  12. rg9rts February 4th, 2015 at 02:59

    Hey Boner….want a good laugh?? Look at the record of accomplishments by congress since you became speaker. 0

  13. Wells February 4th, 2015 at 13:21

    Boner? How about a Buffett? Short for Butt-it. Enjoy yersef:

    Warren Buffett’s plans to run BNSF loaded with coal/oil/gas through Washington State is up against significant odds. No petro tankcar and pipeline laying in Oregon look like a done deal. The pipeline Keystone improves existing oil/gas operations initially and proper safety treatments further north to existing domestic operations, not necessarily much more to Alberta tar sands Canada.

    Rail transport ultimately could not win over downsizing K-less-XL.

    The feds could be planning a scenario of some sort that installs modern passenger-rail on all the major corridors, whatever that takes. 200mph HSR is too little too late. World rail grade standards should apply in these so-called united states. Must we upgrade existing railway corridors now? Do you not still believe a ‘dual-mode’ Talgo-type Spanish design, USA engineered (during WWII) at 125mph is better for CaliforniaUSA?
    Go figure.
    Author, the Seattle Circulator Plan (still blacklisted in Seattle)
    Go Patriots !! (Better tunnel builders)

    • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 13:43

      Repunzel’s Horse here. Long lost way, rhymes with neigh.
      Question: Why does a horse laugh?
      Answer: If you don’t know just figure it out.
      Horses ride people and pull wagons?

      • Mike February 4th, 2015 at 14:16

        Dude, quit bogartin da bong an pass dat thang dis way…!!!

        • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 15:14

          An I tank yew too, hobo. Ain’t it, too much?
          All this here watchin things gon?
          Go-on. Goan?
          The Laughing horse laughs.
          Hm! Hmm-hmm! hm-hmm..
          Hmm. (^;

          • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 15:15

            Ah-lah! Live. try to love. forgive. leave. la-la-lah…..al-ah!

            • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 15:25

              If for that alone, some/most/others could love islam.

  14. Wells February 4th, 2015 at 14:21

    Boehner? How about a Buffett? Short for Butt-it, Boner. Enjoy yersef reedur:

    Warren Buffett’s plans to run BNSF loaded with coal/oil/gas through Washington State is up against significant odds. No petro tankcar and pipeline laying in Oregon looking like a done deal. The pipeline Keystone improves existing oil/gas operations initially and proper safety treatments further north to existing domestic operations, not necessarily much more to Alberta tar sands Canada. Thus, rail transport ultimately cannot win over pipelines and downsizing, K-less-XL.

    The feds could be planning a scenario of some sort that installs modern passenger-rail on all the major corridors, whatever that takes. 200mph HSR is too little too late. World rail grade standards should apply in these so-called united states. Must we upgrade existing railway corridors now? The ‘dual-mode’ Talgo Spanish trainset, (engineered during WWII in USA), could at 125mph, serve California better than 220mph
    Screach-Whistlers from BomBardier? Love the Talgo.
    Go Patriots!! (Better tunnel builders)

    • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 14:43

      Repunzel’s Horse here. Long lost way, rhymes with neigh.
      Question: Why does a horse laugh?
      Answer: If you don’t know just figure it out.
      Horses ride people and pull wagons?

      • Mike February 4th, 2015 at 15:16

        Dude, quit bogartin da bong an pass dat thang dis way…!!!

        • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 16:14

          An I tank yew too, hobo. Ain’t it, too much?
          All this here watchin things goan? Go-inanon?
          The Laughing horse laughs.
          Hm! Hmm-hmm! hm-hmm. Hmm. (^;

          • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 16:15

            ah-lah! live, try to love, forgive, leave. Ala-la-lah…..Al-lah!

            • Wells February 4th, 2015 at 16:25

              If for that alone, some/most/others could love islam.

  15. Mike February 4th, 2015 at 14:20

    Yea right, cuz none of the president’s policies have worked. Who wants lower unemployment, high consumer confidence, millions more insured, or $2 gas…not me, that’s for sure.

  16. Mike February 4th, 2015 at 15:20

    Yea right, cuz none of the president’s policies have worked. Who wants lower unemployment, high consumer confidence, millions more insured, or $2 gas…not me, that’s for sure.

  17. Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 01:06

    “The same old policies that have failed for the last 6 years” ~ Boehor

    I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

  18. Kick Frenzy February 5th, 2015 at 02:06

    “The same old policies that have failed for the last 6 years” ~ Boehor

    I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.

Leave a Reply