WashPost Monday: Redefining The N-Word
Click here for reuse options!As with the previous attempts, the NFL’s “zero tolerance” policy — which gives referees leeway to issue a 15-yard penalty for a first offense and ejection for a second — comes with good intentions: to establish a field of play free of the most racially charged word in American history.
But like the others, it is almost certainly doomed to fail; to be ignored, at best — or mocked and flouted, at worst.
If there is one thing certain about the modern n-word — a shifty organism that has managed to survive on these shores for hundreds of years by lurking in dark corners, altering its form, splitting off into a second specimen and constantly seeking out new hosts, all the while retaining its basic and vile DNA — it is that it defies black-and-white interpretations and hard-and-fast rules.
he word is too essential as an urban slang term to be placed in a casket and buried, as NAACP delegates attempted to do in a 2007 mock “funeral” for the word. It is too ingrained in youth culture to be eliminated from city streets, as the New York City Council attempted with a symbolic resolution banning the word the same year. And more than likely, it will prove too complex and nuanced to be policed by football referees wielding yellow flags and penalties. Never mind the troublesome optics of a group of mostly white NFL executives dictating the language rules of a majority-black player pool.
If anything, in 2014, it is the very notion of banning the n-word that appears dead and fit for burial.
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
2 responses to WashPost Monday: Redefining The N-Word
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
J.D. Rhoades November 10th, 2014 at 08:12
“You can’t just ban a word, as the NFL is trying to do”
You mean like “Redskins”?
J.D. Rhoades November 10th, 2014 at 09:12
“You can’t just ban a word, as the NFL is trying to do”
You mean like “Redskins”?