Phil Robertson: You Can’t Get STD’s From Biblically Correct Sex

Posted by | October 8, 2014 10:48 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Religion Top Stories


The “Duck Dynasty Star” and sexpert doesn’t believe you can get a sexually transmitted disease if you use the Bible as a sex manual.

“Biblically correct sex is safe,” Robertson said during a sermon in West Monroe, Louisiana last month. “It’s safe. You’re not going to get chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, AIDS — if you, if a man marries a woman, and neither of you have it, and you keep your sex between the two of you, you’re not going to get ever sexually transmitted diseases.”

Robertson went on to blame “orthodox liberal opinion” for the spread of “debilitating diseases” around the U.S. and the world and accused his audience of being — like himself — “sexually immoral” at some point in their lives…

Researcher Elizabeth Boskey challenged the notion that monogamous sex can be devoid of sexually-transmitted diseases in a column for About.com this past February.

“Even if you had undergone regular screening, if you were infected while having sex with a partner who had not been tested in years, there is always the possibility that they were infected asymptomatically a long time before you got together – and just didn’t know it,” Boskey wrote. “Even when you are having sex with someone who is infected with an std, you won’t necessarily get infected the first time you sleep together. Particularly if you intermittently practice safe sex, it could take months or even years.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

129 responses to Phil Robertson: You Can’t Get STD’s From Biblically Correct Sex

  1. tpartynitwit October 8th, 2014 at 12:40

    So if I clutch a Bible and shout verses while shtupping, I can’t get STDs?

    • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 12:51

      Between your knees, between your knees. It works better than an aspirin.

      • tpartynitwit October 8th, 2014 at 13:03

        Sounds constricting.

        • Dwendt44 October 8th, 2014 at 13:04

          But not impossible.
          Edited to correct for fat fingers.

          • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 13:08

            Possible with fully functioning hips and knees.

        • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 13:08

          Bend over.

    • tracey marie October 8th, 2014 at 13:08

      I will repeat that hilarious question/comment to my friends

  2. Larry Schmitt October 8th, 2014 at 12:40

    I thought he meant the missionary position.

  3. tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 12:55

    So, nobody’s mentioned Mary Magdalene? There’s no mention of STD’s but she was a prostitute, right?

    • Dwendt44 October 8th, 2014 at 13:04

      No, she wasn’t. Odds are she was a widow though.

      • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 13:08

        OK, I “misremembered” my bible stories. I’ll go back now and reread it.

        • Larry Schmitt October 8th, 2014 at 13:48

          From Wikipedia: “It is almost universally agreed today that characterizations of Mary Magdalene in western Christianity as a repentant prostitute or loose woman are unfounded.”

          • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 14:46

            Thanks for that. I didn’t want to but a bible anyway.

        • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 17:36

          oh, no–that’s what you were taught…

          it’s yet another way the church kept women down for centuries…

          • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 20:25

            That explains why the Nuns were so fond of beating the boys.

            • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 22:54

              hehehe…that and misplaced sexual repression, yeah… :)

              • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 23:03

                I thought that was only the priests and altar boys.

                • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 23:45

                  no, silly! the repressed, sexually frustrated nun takes out her anxiety on little boy butts…

                  • tiredoftea October 9th, 2014 at 00:13

                    Ours used rulers on the backs of our hands. The priests specialized in little boy butts.

                    • Tammy Minton Haley October 9th, 2014 at 21:23

                      i like the new pope…?

                      :)

  4. tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 12:55

    So, nobody’s mentioned Mary Magdalene? There’s no mention of STD’s but she was a prostitute, right?

    • Dwendt44 October 8th, 2014 at 13:04

      No, she wasn’t. Odds are she was a widow though.

      • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 13:08

        OK, I “misremembered” my bible stories. I’ll go back now and reread it.

        • Larry Schmitt October 8th, 2014 at 13:48

          From Wikipedia: “It is almost universally agreed today that characterizations of Mary Magdalene in western Christianity as a repentant prostitute or loose woman are unfounded.”

          • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 14:46

            Thanks for that. I didn’t want to buy a bible anyway.

        • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 17:36

          oh, no–that’s what you were taught…

          it’s yet another way the church kept women down for centuries…

          • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 20:25

            That explains why the Nuns were so fond of beating the boys.

            • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 22:54

              hehehe…that and misplaced sexual repression, yeah… :)

              • tiredoftea October 8th, 2014 at 23:03

                I thought that was only the priests and altar boys.

                • Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 23:45

                  no, silly! the repressed, sexually frustrated nun takes out her anxiety on little boy butts…

                  • tiredoftea October 9th, 2014 at 00:13

                    Ours used rulers on the backs of our hands. The priests specialized in little boy butts.

                    • Tammy Minton Haley October 9th, 2014 at 21:23

                      i like the new pope…?

                      :)

  5. Dwendt44 October 8th, 2014 at 13:12

    An admitted pedophile giving sermons and advice on sexual practices somehow doesn’t enlighten me.

  6. Dwendt44 October 8th, 2014 at 13:12

    An admitted pedophile giving sermons and advice on sexual practices somehow doesn’t enlighten me.

  7. Bunya October 8th, 2014 at 14:25

    Is it just me or does Phil Robertson have a fixation on gay sex? He’s sounding a lot like well know “crystal Methodist” Ted Haggart.

  8. Bunya October 8th, 2014 at 14:25

    Is it just me or does Phil Robertson have a fixation on gay sex? He’s sounding a lot like well know “crystal Methodist” Ted Haggart.

  9. tracey marie October 8th, 2014 at 14:28

    Actually all this stupid is great. The akins, mourdocks, bachmanns did the same thing befor the 2012 elections and look what happened. keep talking about other peoples sex lives, making ignorant comments about STD’s and marriage…please push that book of myths with your ridiculous looking pedophile pushing inbreds as your voice and face in America…please proceed

  10. tracey marie October 8th, 2014 at 14:28

    Actually all this stupid is great. The akins, mourdocks, bachmanns did the same thing befor the 2012 elections and look what happened. keep talking about other peoples sex lives, making ignorant comments about STD’s and marriage…please push that book of myths with your ridiculous looking pedophile pushing inbreds as your voice and face in America…please proceed

  11. Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 17:33

    this is why we can’t have nice things…

  12. Tammy Minton Haley October 8th, 2014 at 17:33

    this is why we can’t have nice things…

  13. whatthe46 October 8th, 2014 at 20:15

    what the fk is up with these people that they are so concerned with other people sex lives? and what the fk is up with these people that are obviously so interested in listening to them do so? pervs. every last one of them.

  14. whatthe46 October 8th, 2014 at 20:15

    what the fk is up with these people that they are so concerned with other people sex lives? and what the fk is up with these people that are obviously so interested in listening to them do so? pervs. every last one of them.

  15. Paul Duca October 10th, 2014 at 04:30

    Presumably, the 15-year-old you marry doesn’t have them….

  16. Paul Duca October 10th, 2014 at 04:30

    Presumably, the 15-year-old you marry doesn’t have them….

  17. Mephistophiles October 10th, 2014 at 09:16

    Biblically correct sex? That’s sex with your own daughters, isn’t it?

  18. jkarov October 16th, 2014 at 07:15

    I wonder if 15 year old girls (the ones he suggests everyone should marry) can give you an STD. Maybe they could get you locked up in jail instead

  19. jkarov October 16th, 2014 at 07:15

    I wonder if 15 year old girls (the ones he suggests everyone should marry) can give you an STD. Maybe they could get you locked up in jail instead

1 2

Leave a Reply