Mike Vanderboegh Still Thinks There’s A Good Chance Harry Reid’s ‘Balls’ Will Be ‘Ripped Off’

Posted by | May 8, 2014 09:24 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Radio Interviews Top Stories


Mike Vanderboegh was on radio Wednesday night declaring that a civil war is likely and that Harry Reid wants violence. Vanerboegh compared Cliven Bundy to Dred Scott, defending his law-breaking. And he doubled down on previous comments that bricks should be thrown through windows of local Democratic offices to “send a message.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

199 responses to Mike Vanderboegh Still Thinks There’s A Good Chance Harry Reid’s ‘Balls’ Will Be ‘Ripped Off’

  1. Dana King May 8th, 2014 at 21:28

    Alan, you’re just as bad as every other talking head. You just can’t shut the f*** up long enough to let the person you’re interviewing finish their point or you go on a tangent, purposely, because you don’t want to validate something they said because you’re trying to paint them in a negative light. That’s old and transparent, dolt. You’re an idiot, Colmes.

    • Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:50

      Alan is more than overly fair in his interviews with others. And his facts are well proven correct as linked and embedded, despite your denial e.g. -Oh, and the Chinese project 3 Full Hours from Bundy’s 1948 bought 1/2 Sq mile teeny ranch was canceled in 2013 anyway. But the fact that the associated web pages were taken are just “proof” that it’s a conspiracy-via C & L linking the Las Vegas Sun Debunking your Tea Party ball swallowers http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/17/facts-disprove-conspiracy-theory-about-sen-harry-r/

      • Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:27

        couldnt agree more. I think Colmes is TO fair lol I want him to rip some balz off

    • Betty Clouse May 11th, 2014 at 11:25

      And you are a idiot!

  2. Dana King May 8th, 2014 at 21:28

    Alan, you’re just as bad as every other talking head. You just can’t shut the f*** up long enough to let the person you’re interviewing finish their point or you go on a tangent, purposely, because you don’t want to validate something they said because you’re trying to paint them in a negative light. That’s old and transparent.

    • Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:50

      Alan is more than overly fair in his interviews with others. And his facts are well proven correct as linked and embedded, despite your denial e.g. -Oh, and the Chinese project is “3 Full Hours” from Bundy’s 1948 bought 1/2 Sq mile teeny ranch! The 3-Hr away Solar project was canceled in 2013 anyway!

      But those facts were omitted from the associated web pages and dishonestly taken as just “proof” that it’s a conspiracy~! -via C & L linking the Las Vegas Sun easily Debunking your tea party ball-swallowing rippers. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/17/facts-disprove-conspiracy-theory-about-sen-harry-r/

      • Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:27

        couldnt agree more. I think Colmes is TO fair lol I want him to rip some balz off

    • Betty Clouse May 11th, 2014 at 11:25

      And you are a idiot!

1 2

Leave a Reply