Man Accused Of Bestiality Says It’s His Constitutional Right

Carlos Romero was found in a compromising position with a donkey named Doodle. His lawyers “have filed a motion asking a judge to declare the Florida statute banning sexual activities with animals unconstitutional.”

In the motion filed in Marion County court on Dec. 6, the assistant public defenders handling Romero’s case — Joshua Wyatt, Scott Schmidt and Joshua Lukman — wrote that the statute infringes upon Romero’s due process rights and violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution…

“By making sexual conduct with an animal a crime, the statute demeans individuals like Defendant (Romero) by making his private sexual conduct a crime,” the attorneys wrote…

The attorneys claim that the statute deprives Romero of his “personal liberty and autonomy when it comes to private intimate activities.”

…As another possible reason for unconstitutionality, the attorneys add that the statute doesn’t require that the state prove any harm or injury to the animal “or any proof of the sexual activity being non-consensual.”

“Therefore, the only possible rational basis for the statute is a moral objection to sexual acts considered deviant or downright ‘disgusting,’?” they wrote…

Romero admitted that he gets sexually aroused around animals more so than humans and allegedly masturbated with Doodle in his room. He claimed that he would have had sex with the miniature donkey eventually, but that she wasn’t ready and was “blooming into maturity.”

By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.